Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He said that it was factually untrue that a wall would not decrease the amount of people who want to come tp the U.S. illegally.I think it will make them a better target when or if they climb to the top?
This thread was a lie from the start; you set it to seem as if you wanted to get's other people's views, but really you just wanted to promote the wall.
I didn't say chip immigrants, just illegal ones. I thought we were talking about effective ways to address illegal immigration. Why is that not a solution to consider?Coming from someone who clearly seems to want to chip immigrants against their will, I'm not sure I'm interested in playing. Sorry.
But yes, the NBPC suggests a more encompassing wall would be effective.
Accusations of lying are generally bad form.This thread was a lie from the start; you set it to seem as if you wanted to get's other people's views, but really you just wanted to promote the wall.
The reduction referred to 'attempted' crossings not those caught at crossing.
Whatever...
It was a question, and then I wanted people to explain their reasoning... ME INCLUDED!
If you can't handle that, it's not my problem or anyone elses but your own. Take a hike.
With a wall, that number would decrease, because presumably the attempts at breaching it would diminish. But none of this would stop the inflow of drugs, because they come by ship, by plane, by train, by trucks, through tunnels, and by methods we don't even know about. And a lot of it doesn't come in at all, as it's manufactured right here. So the wall is not going to change the availability of illegal drugs one little bit. Not the crime that they create.Of course it will. Border patrol already seizes millions of pounds of drugs at the border every year. Statistics - Drug seizures
With a wall, that number can only increase.
Their reference link is to themselves, where is the actual survey?
With a wall, that number would decrease, because presumably the attempts at breaching it would diminish. But none of this would stop the inflow of drugs, because they come by ship, by plane, by train, by trucks, through tunnels, and by methods we don't even know about. And a lot of it doesn't come in at all, as it's manufactured right here. So the wall is not going to change the availability of illegal drugs one little bit. Not the crime that they create.
NBPC's website does clearly express support for an effective border security barrier. ....
OP/ED by NBPC President Brandon Judd: Trump’s wall is the best way to end the humanitarian crisis on our southern border
https://bpunion.org/featured/op-ed-...e-humanitarian-crisis-on-our-southern-border/
If Americans didn't buy illegal drugs there wouldn't be illegal drugs being brought in. The problem is us, not them.
With a wall, that number would decrease, because presumably the attempts at breaching it would diminish. But none of this would stop the inflow of drugs, because they come by ship, by plane, by train, by trucks, through tunnels, and by methods we don't even know about. And a lot of it doesn't come in at all, as it's manufactured right here. So the wall is not going to change the availability of illegal drugs one little bit. Not the crime that they create.
I can't help but noticed this is not the actual survey I am looking for; are you unable to find this survey as well?
Believe you me, if you yourself were a border patrol agent or if a beloved family member or dear friend of yours were a border patrol agent, then you'd most likely support an effect border security barrier.
In Hungary, their illegal immigration was reduced 99 percent after this nation erected an effective border security fence, and guess what happened next, crimes rates significantly dropped there as well. So if crime had been significantly reduced after a border security barrier was erected in Hungary, then this stands to reason, an effective border security barrier would likewise significantly reduce crime in parts of the United States.
I've found news reports of this survey, but I've neither found an actual copy of this survey nor an official document of this survey results.
If you are going to draw that subjective correlation then why not for single payer healthcare?