Only if it's necessary for the person's health. I support it for those who truly need it. I'm going to get chest surgery eventually but I've decided that I don't want genital surgery.So you don't support, say, transition surgery?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Only if it's necessary for the person's health. I support it for those who truly need it. I'm going to get chest surgery eventually but I've decided that I don't want genital surgery.So you don't support, say, transition surgery?
Only if it's necessary for the person's health. I support it for those who truly need it. I'm going to get chest surgery eventually but I've decided that I don't want genital surgery.
Recently I've come across three new types of trans identity; trans-age, trans-racial, and trans-species. First let me define these terms, since they can carry multiple interpretations I want to make it clear which I'm referring to. Trans-age refers to a person who believes that they are a different age than their body is and choose to live life as someone of their preferred age. Trans-racial refers to a person who believes that they were born in the wrong skin, essentially (by trans-racial I'm not referring to those who were adopted into a family of a different race and therefore identify as part of that racial group, I'm referring to those who truly believe they were born into the wrong skin color). Trans-species refers to people who believe they are a non-human wrongly born in a human body, commonly referred to as otherkin.
The most problematic aspect of any of these are the legal implications of trans-age. If one claims to be younger than they are, are they bound by the legal restrictions of that age? What if they no longer feel that way? What if someone claims to be older, can a child then gain legal permission to do adult things such as drink and marry?
Are these new identities taking things to far? Do they differ at all from their socially accepted counterparts; mature for your age/childish, fitting in better with a different racial community, and having a spirit animal/feelings spiritually connected to an animal? If so, how? If we choose to legally recognize these identities, how would we adapt the laws? Do you see these identities as legitimate or simply a form of delusion?
I'm not going to answer these questions myself, I'm more interested in what you all think. So, new trans identities; a-ok or no way?
If their dysphoria towards those parts of their bodies is so severe that they can't function normally. If it's making them depressed, suicidal, causing social and sexual dysfunction and they generally can't feel at home in their body, basically.So an honest question: what makes it necessary in your case? Obviously feel free to keep it to yourself.
Ask, and you shall receive (even if you say not to answer).So an honest question: what makes it necessary in your case? Obviously feel free to keep it to yourself.
Perhaps from another angle?You guys equate changing yourself with learning to love yourself, you see a dysfunction giving disorder as something to give in to in order to alleviate it, which is akin to self harm and suicide in someone with depression. It's a position that someone like me just can't understand, I'm sorry. I will continue to try and make my patients better and help them love themselves. But feel lucky if nothing else, cause most of us have to learn and deal with our dysfunction rather than giving in.
You forgot transrational.
Only if it's necessary for the person's health. I support it for those who truly need it. I'm going to get chest surgery eventually but I've decided that I don't want genital surgery.
If gender norms was all it was, we wouldn't be finding the genetic links we do. It's also ignoring that people with gender dysphoria have no interest or desire to live as their birth sex. It's a rejection that is often found before a transsexual is even old enough to know what scientific research and medical data are. Regardless of gender norms, transsexuals are a diverse crowd just as cisgender people are. Some transwomen prefer living the 50's house wife role, some play punk rock and heavy metal. Some transmen are real super-macho stiffs, while some transmen are very flamboyant and effeminate. One thing that is not being brought up is to qualify for treatment is used to be you had to live in the more traditional roles, including jobs. But that policy was dropped many years ago because it was being realized they were having many people pretending to live one life to only have to pretend to live another, because a part of the criteria used to be that you had to also be heterosexual to qualify for treatment. But today you can be a MtF, be covered with tattoos, and work construction. Though there are many gender norms in society that do need to be changed, even with a strict adherence to norms and relaxing them, as well as tremendous shifts in traditional roles in society since transsexuals began to attract scientific attention nearly a century ago, and the only thing that has been happening is the medical approaches have improved tremendously, more people began to seek treatment for it, and as more transsexuals began to appear, their stories were covered more, studies begin showing they are psychologically well-better off after transitioning, acceptance has gradually went up some, more people are coming out, and it's not too hard to see why. Science has looked at numerous treatments and tortures to try and cure gender dysphoria without hormones and surgery and by making the person comfortable with and accepting of their birth sex, but it's just never worked. Medical treatment, on the other hand, has shown to have a very high rate of success.What I fear is that people who have gender dysphoria become convinced, based upon available medical and hormonal applications and a rather strong liberal attitude to utilize such expensive and invasive measures that such individuals must undergo those procedures, when the case may be that social norms regarding gender concepts within a culture are what truly needs addressing. That society needs to reassess their view of gender norms.
There used to be fears concerning racial integration. But today it's simply unfathomable for a decent person to have issues or concerns regarding racial integration, because the fears are unfounded. Now, do we allow unfounded fears to dictate society and law, or do we allow reason and logic to decide?and the actual sensitive subjects from people being afraid of sexual males, transgender or not, entering a restroom with their young girls.
If gender norms was all it was, we wouldn't be finding the genetic links we do. It's also ignoring that people with gender dysphoria have no interest or desire to live as their birth sex. It's a rejection that is often found before a transsexual is even old enough to know what scientific research and medical data are. Regardless of gender norms, transsexuals are a diverse crowd just as cisgender people are. Some transwomen prefer living the 50's house wife role, some play punk rock and heavy metal. Some transmen are real super-macho stiffs, while some transmen are very flamboyant and effeminate. One thing that is not being brought up is to qualify for treatment is used to be you had to live in the more traditional roles, including jobs. But that policy was dropped many years ago because it was being realized they were having many people pretending to live one life to only have to pretend to live another, because a part of the criteria used to be that you had to also be heterosexual to qualify for treatment. But today you can be a MtF, be covered with tattoos, and work construction. Though there are many gender norms in society that do need to be changed, even with a strict adherence to norms and relaxing them, as well as tremendous shifts in traditional roles in society since transsexuals began to attract scientific attention nearly a century ago, and the only thing that has been happening is the medical approaches have improved tremendously, more people began to seek treatment for it, and as more transsexuals began to appear, their stories were covered more, studies begin showing they are psychologically well-better off after transitioning, acceptance has gradually went up some, more people are coming out, and it's not too hard to see why. Science has looked at numerous treatments and tortures to try and cure gender dysphoria without hormones and surgery and by making the person comfortable with and accepting of their birth sex, but it's just never worked. Medical treatment, on the other hand, has shown to have a very high rate of success.
There used to be fears concerning racial integration. But today it's simply unfathomable for a decent person to have issues or concerns regarding racial integration, because the fears are unfounded. Now, do we allow unfounded fears to dictate society and law, or do we allow reason and logic to decide?
Gender norms do not contribute to gender dysphoria. There are also a number of transsexuals who do not uphold to these norms, and the requirements for treatment even dropped the part requiring someone adhere to and uphold traditional norms because there isn't any link between norms and gender dysphoria.I'm stating that there is a pressure based upon a non-scientific concept that the idea of the male/female sexual identity equates to a male/female gender identity role imposed by society.
If you're a guy who acts feminine, but does not actually identify as female, then you can't transition. A woman can't transition just she was a tom boy as a girl. And various treatments without hormones and surgery have been tried, and have been pretty much just as successful as reparative therapy trying to change the sexual orientation of homosexuals. A guy who does identify as female can act feminine, but that doesn't address the issue of gender dysphoria.I believe that many people who suffer from the consequences of gender dysphoria imposed by societal norms could achieve a healthier life without the idea of hormone therapy and sexual reassignment because our society demands a certain one to one relationship between the two terms.
That can be true, but many cultures have had more than two genders, and we still find evidence of transsexuals in those cultures.Gender roles across numerous cultures vary and we are stuck within a certain narrow definition due to certain cultural definitions of gender roles.
I agree, there probably even are people who consider themselves transgender because they don't fit the gender stereotypes but who are otherwise completely fine with the body they have.I'm stating that there is a pressure based upon a non-scientific concept that the idea of the male/female sexual identity equates to a male/female gender identity role imposed by society. I believe that many people who suffer from the consequences of gender dysphoria imposed by societal norms could achieve a healthier life without the idea of hormone therapy and sexual reassignment because our society demands a certain one to one relationship between the two terms.
And that is where those such as yourself differ from transsexuals. With transsexuals, it isn't about roles and norms, but the need to live as their identified sex.But since I can express my gender for the most part independently of what body I have, I don't feel the need to actually live as a man
That is the only time doctors will support medical treatments and sign the required letters of recommendation. And it takes months of therapy before hormones are even prescribed, and you have to be on hormones for at least 12 months and live full time as your identified sex for no less than 12 months before the letters of recommendation for surgery can be signed.it's only when you don't get along with the physical characteristics you have that I'd consider hormone therapy and/or surgery to be recommendable.
I think you misunderstood me; I do have a problem with my physical characteristics and would like to have the body of a male; I don't identify that much with the roles and norms associated with it, though, which is why I'm reluctant to actually go through with it. But I haven't even started therapy, so I may think different about that in the future.And that is where those such as yourself differ from transsexuals. With transsexuals, it isn't about roles and norms, but the need to live as their identified sex.
That is the only time doctors will support medical treatments and sign the required letters of recommendation. And it takes months of therapy before hormones are even prescribed, and you have to be on hormones for at least 12 months and live full time as your identified sex for no less than 12 months before the letters of recommendation for surgery can be signed.Liu said:It's only when you don't get along with the physical characteristics you have that I'd consider hormone therapy and/or surgery to be recommendable.
I have to disagree with you there. Of course society's expectations in terms of gender and the body make dysphoria worse and cause anxiety and insecurity. It makes you feel like you're second rate, at best, compared to cis men and women, that you'll never compare. I struggle with that quite a bit.Gender norms do not contribute to gender dysphoria.