You mean it does not, then?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It also makes many of us (based upon innumerable discussions with CCW/CPL holders) very careful.In my experience, particularly when working in bars and clubs, the presence or easy availability of a weapon emboldens many to do what they may not do unarmed.
You mean it does not, then?
We don't' know how intimidating he actually was, if he actually confronted Martin (rather than Martin confronting him), or if Zimmerman ever used any force whatsoever until the moment when deadly force was being used on him.Of course, it is not like there was a crime to be stopped, so that, too, is a moot point.
Zimmerman was not using the necessary force or intimidation for stopping some misdeed, because there was nothing happening that demanded his intervention.
You say I might not...understand.
Let's assume otherwise and say I do.
Then we might continue.
We don't' know how intimidating he actually was, if he actually confronted Martin (rather than Martin confronting him), or if Zimmerman ever used any force whatsoever until the moment when deadly force was being used on him.
Regarding the OP... I say yes, if Zimmerman were unarmed, he still would have gotten out of the car. He only got out of the car to keep an eye on Martin... not to confront him.
I have a question for anyone wishing to contribute without getting into the actual trial and resulting verdict.
Do you think George Zimmerman would have left his vehicle and followed Trevon if he had not been armed? Understanding this is pure speculation, I would just like to hear what you think.
I think it possible, considering his frustration over crime in his community. He appeared agitated when he made the call to 9-11 and he appeared to react emotionally (by not staying with his vehicle).