G
The 1260 Prophecy does not needs maths. Islam was to be abrogated in the year 1260, the Bible simply references AH1260.
Just the same as it was to be be abrogated in the year 1844, William Miller calculated that via mathematical calculations of prophecy and uses the Christian Calander, but when did that start, year 1 was not the birth of Christ.
I will offer no more on this.
Regards Tony
That reply CG is the essence of not seeing the Forrest because of the trees.What kind of "forest" and "trees" are you talking about? The events had a starting date. Was it 622AD? No. Not one of them. But, for Baha'is, they all had an ending date, I260 in the Islamic calendar.
But Baha'is keep laying it on. Was 666AD the year the Umayyad's got control of Islam? No, it was 661AD.
So, what do Baha'is do? They add five years to that, because they say Jesus wasn't born in the year "zero". Great, but Baha's also keep switching from the lunar years of the Islamic calendar to the solar years of the Gregorian calendar.
And on top of that Baha'is make the Umayyad's the Beast power. Did they start in 622AD and last until 1844? No.
So, call it "forests" and "trees" if you want, but I just don't agree with the math and the interpretations.
I'd expect nothing less than for you to believe them completely and believe that I'm wrong in my thinking.
The 1260 Prophecy does not needs maths. Islam was to be abrogated in the year 1260, the Bible simply references AH1260.
Just the same as it was to be be abrogated in the year 1844, William Miller calculated that via mathematical calculations of prophecy and uses the Christian Calander, but when did that start, year 1 was not the birth of Christ.
I will offer no more on this.
Regards Tony