Do you have any thoughts on the morals of animals?Yes, we don't know if non-human animals are moral agents and usually assume they are not.
No, there is no real set age. I've met folks far older than me with less maturity than my oldest son.Children are not moral agents, nor are people with limited mental capacity, but there is no fine line between children and adults. The law sets an arbitrary date, but you don't become a fully moral agent, just by turning 18 (or whatever date it is where you live).
When and how do you feel a person becomes a moral agent?
It is ironic those terms are picked sometimes. It does often mean "I want to practice my religion, but I don't want you to do the same."An example of hypocrisy would be "religious liberty" rights, as they are wanted by some extreme evangelicals and republican lawmakers. They want a privilege to display their faith without granting the equal right to other faiths. The Church of Satan frequently points out the hypocrisy by erecting Baphomet statues near Christian displays, usually the ten commandments.
What's the situation regarding 'religious liberty' in Germany?
An obligation to do no harm sounds tricky. It can be hard to fully steer clear of anything that brings harm to another.It does. But I don't think it is a moral right. We have an obligation to do no harm, but we don't have an obligation to do good.
A moral act (or, in most cases, refrain from acting) can be neutral. A good act is going above and beyond moral obligation.
Where do you feel a line should be drawn?
I think that sounds like a fair arrangement...Survival is not a thing we usually have to contemplate in our modern world. It is so rare indeed, that we often forget about it when talking about morals. So, it isn't on par with the other pillars, but can override all of them in special circumstances. Without survival being moral, killing in self-defence would be immoral. I can't see that as moral, and I guess very few people would.
Other than that, there is no hierarchy. That's why moral dilemmas exit. One has to carefully way one right against another when they conflict. We had that recently in the pandemic. Liberty (to not get vaccinated) had to compete with wellbeing (not being subjected to the virus).
I made an (only half joking) comment about people wanting to go to church without masks. I said they should have the right to go in (their liberty), but not to come out (potentially harming other people).