Farmall F12 like this one for me.
(Albeit un-restored)
Tractors have evolved a long way since prehistoric times.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Farmall F12 like this one for me.
(Albeit un-restored)
God help me, I think that looks really cool.Farmall F12 like this one for me.
(Albeit un-restored)
It is what's called an "unstyled" tractor becauseGod help me, I think that looks really cool.
Modern tractors are more useful.Tractors have evolved a long way since prehistoric times.
First you have to use up all those cases of toilet paper.And I've already cleared a space in the garage for a Ferrari.
I didn't know I'd told you about that issue.First you have to use up all those cases of toilet paper.
{ checks dictionary for 'fun' }Modern tractors are more useful.
Antique tractors are more fun.
I didn't know I'd told you about that issue.
Interesting, but I do not believe this addresses the problem of using the anecdotal description of evolution as a "fact." The use is a bit misleading.Really?
I would say instead that it is pointing out an unfortunate lack of epistemological seriousness in casual discourse.
Our communities go out of their ways in order to lend prestige to straws of belief and waste obscene amounts of attention and emotional energy in order to protect them.
Is it? Why?Interesting, but I do not believe this addresses the problem of using the anecdotal description of evolution as a "fact." The use is a bit misleading.
The proper definition of a 'fact' is objective verifiable evidence that does not change. The sciences Evolution change and evolve with newknowledge. The misuse of the term gives those that reject evolution a crack to justify their objections.Is it? Why?
Evolution in the sense of changes of allele freqency and other measures is a fact, the science or theory is not, This is only relevant when arguing with deniers.The proper definition of a 'fact' is objective verifiable evidence that does not change. The sciences Evolution change and evolve with newknowledge. The misuse of the term gives those that reject evolution a crack to justify their objections.
The sciences of evolution is NOT a "fact." You may say the sciences of evolution are "fact" based.