Shad
Veteran Member
If revelation contradicts science it is a subject of science. If it makes claims regarding nature it is a subject of science.
Which makes claims about reality which science is involved with as well
See my first points.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Superstitions have got nothing to do with religion or science.
- Thread starter paarsurrey
- Start date
If revelation contradicts science it is a subject of science. If it makes claims regarding nature it is a subject of science.
Which makes claims about reality which science is involved with as well
See my first points.
Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Common sense: If we hold a pencil in the air, it will drop because of gravity
Physics is the study of gravity
Common sense: The earth revolves that creates an illusion that the sun is rising and falling
Science: Study of astrology
Basic knowledge studied by science.
God isn't in the field of science. It isn't considered common sense because it is unjustified by universal facts like gravity. Regardless of what part of the world you are at, and who studies it, gravity is the same.
It's common sense that one and one is two. Regardless of where you are in the world, it's justified that one thing on either side come together doubles.
The study of mathematics.
God is a superstition because unlike the study of astrology, mathematics, physics, et cetera, there is no "universal method" or natural means to test whether god exists or not. It comes from people who believe in him not any external stimuli. Therefore, it is called a superstition.
Nothing wrong with that.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
"Common sense"
Common Sense vs Science
"Common sense and science are two words that are often confused when it comes to their meanings when strictly speaking, there is a difference between the two words. Common sense is our usual understanding of practical issues. The word common sense is used in the sense of ‘natural instinct.’ On the other hand, science is the study or knowledge of the physical and natural world based on observation and experimentation. The word science is used in the sense of a ‘kind of knowledge.’ Common sense is our knowledge of day to day life. Science goes a step beyond and provides scientific explanations for realities in life and those that we take for granted. This is the main difference between the two words. This article attempts to highlight the difference between these two while providing a comprehensive understanding of each word."
Difference Between Common Sense and Science
Please
Regards
Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Use your own words. It will be eazier to communicate since Ill know what YOU think not try to figure out what you mean by reading different definitions of the same word.
Science is the study of the natural world. A lot ofnthings like understanding how gravity works is common sense. They support each other once studied and understood.
God and revelation is not the same. It is not supported by science, it is not common sense, it is ujustified.
Its a superstition.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Common Sense is not a synonym of science. Common sense is not the same with every body. And Common Sense is very uncommon to be found:
“Common sense is not so common.”
― Voltaire
Quotes About Common Sense (352 quotes)
Please
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
paarsurrey said: ↑
Revelation is not a subject of science. Is it? Please
Regards
Revelation is not a subject of science. Is it? Please
No prophet who got Revelation or the Revelation spoke against science. Right? Please
Regards
Shad
Veteran Member
If said revelation makes claims about reality it is.
Maybe not against science of the time. However these days it does.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Shad
Veteran Member
I need no source. Science itself is a method to study reality thus anything that makes claims regarding reality can and is subject to science. It is one of the definition of science itself.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
"a method"
Does science say that it is the only way to find reality? Please quote from science if it ever claimed as such.
Regards
Shad
Veteran Member
No. However it has been more reliable than any other method used including revelation.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
paarsurrey said: ↑
"a method"
Does science say that it is the only way to find reality? Please quote from science if it ever claimed as such.
Regards
Regards
"a method"
Does science say that it is the only way to find reality? Please quote from science if it ever claimed as such.
Regards
That is just one's superstition, as this is neither supported by Revelation nor by science. Please
Regards
Shad
Veteran Member
Already answered that question. I need no source
.
Science isn't something one can actually quote as it is a method. One cites scientists.
Do you need science to figure out if you are sad or happy? Hungry or not? If no then you just answered your own question...
Revelation is a superstition.
No one can look at the discoveries developed from methods of science compared to other methods. When you are sick do you go to a doctor or the Quran? Which provides medical services that work? Which one is used to launch probes to Mars. It isn't revelation nor the Quran
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
"a method"
Science has been described as a method, it doesn't deny that there are no other methods. Please
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Further added:
Scientific Method is itself invented by Philosophy not by science.
Regards
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
science says "we cannot predict the future".
Yet I see people who eulogize science beyond its limits, saying that one day science will cover the whole of human life. Right? Please
Is it not predicting about future? Please
Regards
Aupmanyav
Be your own guru
Revelation by a God or his representative is the biggest superstition.
leibowde84
Veteran Member
This is not a limitation of science, it is a limitation of God. Science only deals with things that can be shown or evidenced in quantifiable ways. God cannot be evidenced in quantifiable, demonstrable ways. So, God is limited in that God cannot be shown to exist scientifically.What is "god"
Verse (2:255)
Sahih International: Allah - there is no deity except Him, the Ever-Living, the Sustainer of [all] existence. Neither drowsiness overtakes Him nor sleep. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. Who is it that can intercede with Him except by His permission? He knows what is [presently] before them and what will be after them, and they encompass not a thing of His knowledge except for what He wills. His Kursi extends over the heavens and the earth, and their preservation tires Him not. And He is the Most High, the Most Great.
The Quranic Arabic Corpus - Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran
God with the name Allah has many attributes mentioned and explained/illustrated in the whole of Quran, and some of them have been mentioned in the above verse .
Science does not discuss G-d, it cannot be its subject to discuss as science has its limitation, it cannot cross them over.
Science explores nature, and nature has been caused by G-d.
Please
Regards
Thief
Rogue Theologian
correction.....Man is limited by his sight
many have eyes and do not see
God is limited only by the rules of reality He has formed
His own mindset is His only limitation
FunctionalAtheist
Hammer of Reason
You are half right!