Just tell me what your point is.
You seem not to know except that whatever it is, it's offstage somewhere.
Then give me a nice clear example on stage, no links &c, and maybe then offstage material will be relevant.
---------------------
1. My points are that ancient knowledge is hugely underestimated.
2. That ancient myths of creation contains real astronomical and cosmological knowledge.
3. That this knowledge can be compared to modern science and make sense.
4. That ancient knowledge in some cases is more logical than modern cosmological science.
5. That modern cosmological science is largely based on speculations instead of natural observations.
The comparison between ancient and modern science is not a new one, but I have my own special approach in this matter and this deals specifically with the ancient myths of the Milky Way and its connection with the ancient cultural Stories of Creation, which is long forgotten by many scholars.
Of course, this special approach to the topic leaves me with very few sources of notes since the subject is long forgotten.
I´ve earlier linked you to the Egyptian
goddess Hathor and her Milky Way connection. I´ve also linked you the an ancient Egyptian creation story, the Ogdoad, which describes the creation in a genius and symbolic way of explaining the principles in the creation.
Excerpt from the Ogdoad telling:
1) “The eight deities were arranged in four male-female pairs: Nu and Naunet, Amun and Amaunet, Kuk and Kauket, Huh and Hauhet. The males were associated with frogs and females were associated with snakes. Apart from their gender, there was little to distinguish the male gods and female goddesses; indeed, the names of the females are merely derivative female forms of the male name.
Essentially, each pair represents the male and female aspect of one of four concepts, namely the primordial waters (Nu and Naunet), air or invisibility (Amun and Amaunet), darkness (Kuk and Kauket), and eternity or infinity (Huh and Hauhet).
2) Together, the four concepts represent the primal, fundamental state of the beginning, they are what always was. In the myth, however, their interaction ultimately proved to be unbalanced, resulting in the arising of a new entity. When the entity opened, it revealed Ra, the fiery sun, inside. After a long interval of rest, Ra, together with the other deities, created all other things”.
-------------
This explanation deals with the PRINCIPLES of creation, symbolized by the male and female qualities in creation. It deals with "opposite but complementary" forces and qualities. And by naming the Ra god "as the first fiery entity" which is created out of the coming together of the basic elements, the entire story deals with the creation of the Milky Way because the goddess Hathor resembles the Milky Way and Hathor is closely connected to the god Ra.
OBS: Ra is scholarly interpreted to represent the Sun, but in fact this should be the central light in the Milky Way. Of course, since most scholars have no clues of the Milky Way Mythology, their only option is to interpret "light" and Ra as the Sun, and this mistake is flourishing all over in encyclopedia and in books of this subject.
-------------------------------
So, now you see what I am up against when trying to re-create and re-tell an ancient knowledge which is long forgotten and which is eminent and in some cases more logic than modern cosmological thoughts.
I fully understand if people have difficulties in grasping the ancient and mostly forgotten knowledge and sometimes I´m having a huge task in explaining because i sort of "have to create a whole new concept" - even as this concept is as ancient as the first civilized humans and even older.
Ok, I hope you can use this and if you have some questions, feel very welcome.
