"THE LORD'S DAY IS THE SABBATH DAY NOT SUNDAY ACCORDING TO SCRIPTURES

[3rdAngel]

In what way did his exegesis fail, SZ?

This should be funny, I bet he does not address any post content, pass the popcorn

 

[3rdAngel]

Oh my! Once again accusing others of what you are guilty of.

Then prove your claims. I will wait or are you deflecting again

 

[3rdAngel]

3rdAngel said: ↑ So that is a no than? You do not want to address the scripture content of my posts that are in disagreement with you. All of your past questions and post content were answered section by section and proven false here in post # 1268 linked; post # 1269 linked; post # 1270 linked and post # 1271 linked for all to see that your making false claims again. My question to you dear friend is do you want to actually try now to respond to the content in these linked posts that prove from the scriptures why your earlier posts are in error or are you going to project, and deflect with false claims and accusations and run away?

Your response here...

But the links did not do that. It was just another post showing your poor debating technique.
Once again, if you want to use a link in this sort of debate you need to quote link and explain. I did not see that in any of our links.

Sure they did. The links were provided as evidence that prove why your acolyte's earlier posts were in error and so also show that your acolytes claims that he addressed the content in these posts was not truthful. Perhaps if you disagree you can prove your claims here and show me how your acolyte has addressed the content in the posts that have been linked as evidence to show that he simply ignored them and did not respond to them. If you cannot than your doing the same things you always do and that is to simply make false claims you are unable to prove and then runaway from the discussion when challenged to prove what you say. I already know it is the latter and you will not be able to prove what you say here so you lose again. If you disagree you are welcome to prove why you disagree.

 

[Subduction Zone]

#1417.
Facts which can be seen by all.
So many unanswered questions from which you are on the run.

Oh my, now that is a falsehood. One more chance and then the Gish Gallop rule kicks in . If I refute one I refute them all, or do you want to try to debate properly for once?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Then prove your claims. I will wait or are you deflecting again

Dude, I do prove my claims. I just refuse to go back pages and pages to do so. The time to object is when a claim is first made. Not long after the fact.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Your response here...

Sure they did. The links were provided as evidence that prove why your acolyte's earlier posts were in error and so also show that your acolytes claims that he addressed the content in these posts was not truthful. Perhaps if you disagree you can prove your claims here and show me how your acolyte has addressed the content in the posts that have been linked as evidence to show that he simply ignored them and did not respond to them. If you cannot than your doing the same things you always do and that is to simply make false claims you are unable to prove and then runaway from the discussion when challenged to prove what you say. I already know it is the latter and you will not be able to prove what you say here so you lose again. If you disagree you are welcome to prove why you disagree.

Wow! You just don't get it. Links do not work that way when you want to use them as evidence.

You need to quote, link and explain. Did you do all three or did you merely link? You screwed yourself if you did not do that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

This should be funny, I bet he does not address any post content, pass the popcorn

Actually she knows how it fails. She did not aske me. That is why I asked you. And guess what? You ran away again.

Do you know why your excessive exegesis fails? You have part of the answer. Did you forget it already?

 

[3rdAngel]

Oh my, now that is a falsehood. One more chance and then the Gish Gallop rule kicks in . If I refute one I refute them all, or do you want to try to debate properly for once?

She is telling you the truth SZ. You just do not want to hear it because she has just proven you lose again and are simply running away from the discussion. Everyone can see it SZ. Just be honest and own it and learn from your mistakes for next time.

 

[3rdAngel]

Dude, I do prove my claims. I just refuse to go back pages and pages to do so. The time to object is when a claim is first made. Not long after the fact.

So that is a no again. You are not able to prove what you say and simply running away again. Thank you for proving my point.

 

[3rdAngel]

3rdAngel said: ↑ Sure they did. The links were provided as evidence that prove why your acolyte's earlier posts were in error and so also show that your acolytes claims that he addressed the content in these posts was not truthful. Perhaps if you disagree you can prove your claims here and show me how your acolyte has addressed the content in the posts that have been linked as evidence to show that he simply ignored them and did not respond to them. If you cannot than your doing the same things you always do and that is to simply make false claims you are unable to prove and then runaway from the discussion when challenged to prove what you say. I already know it is the latter and you will not be able to prove what you say here so you lose again. If you disagree you are welcome to prove why you disagree.

Your response here..

Wow! You just don't get it. Links do not work that way when you want to use them as evidence. You need to quote, link and explain. Did you do all three or did you merely link? You screwed yourself if you did not do that.

You would be more believable if you could prove what you claim. Sadly you cannot. You are deflecting and running away from a discussion again. Everyone can see it. Thank you for proving my point again. Lets talk more when you have something to contribute to the discussion. So far your failing, but I do think our chats are funny even if your not being truthful in your accusations and claims your unable to prove .

 

[Subduction Zone]

She is telling you the truth SZ. You just do not want to hear it because she has just proven you lose again and are simply running away from the discussion. Everyone can see it SZ. Just be honest and own it and learn from your mistakes for next time.

No, and she knows it. She would not take me up on my Gish Gallop challenge. She knows her that at least some of her claims are false, and actually they all may be.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So that is a no again. You are not able to prove what you say and simply running away again. Thank you for proving my point.

This is a falsehood when you do this. I did not give you a "no". I explained how your claims are false. I also have explained multiple times how I have proved my case.

When you run away from questions the only way to "prove" it is to ask the question again. When you run away, which you far too often, that only shows that I was right.

Why are you currently running away from the discussion on why your exegesis fails? It looks like you know that you are wrong when you do so.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Your response here..

You would be more believable if you could prove what you claim. Sadly you cannot. You are deflecting and running away from a discussion again. Everyone can see it. Thank you for proving my point again. Lets talk more when you have something to contribute to the discussion. So far your failing, but I do think our chats are funny even if your not being truthful in your accusations and claims your unable to prove .

In a way you are right. When you run away from questions which is your favorite thing to do, all that I could do to prove it is to ask you the question again and again. Hmm, I think that I just explained that to you.

By the way, requiring the same explanation for the same error of yours is another way that you keep running away. When you do not acknowledge an explanation that is running away. Anyone that follows this thread for more than two pages will simply say "3rd Angel is running away again".

By the way, why are you afraid to discuss your excessive exegesis? Think hard what do you base your claims upon?

 

[3rdAngel]

No, and she knows it. She would not take me up on my Gish Gallop challenge. She knows her that at least some of her claims are false, and actually they all may be.

Sorry dear friend but yep @samtonga43 was being honest with you. Why not acknowledge your mistakes, learn from them and move on?

 

[3rdAngel]

This is a falsehood when you do this. I did not give you a "no". I explained how your claims are false. I also have explained multiple times how I have proved my case. When you run away from questions the only way to "prove" it is to ask the question again. When you run away, which you far too often, that only shows that I was right. Why are you currently running away from the discussion on why your exegesis fails? It looks like you know that you are wrong when you do so.

Not really dear friend. I was not asking you yes and no questions. I specifically asked you to prove your false claims and you failed to do so again proving my point that you make false claims and accusations and when challenged simply show your false claims untruthful and run away. You have been exposed dear friend and everyone can see it now. Lets move one and talk more once you have something to add to the OP.

 

[3rdAngel]

In a way you are right. When you run away from questions which is your favorite thing to do, all that I could do to prove it is to ask you the question again and again. Hmm, I think that I just explained that to you. nBy the way, requiring the same explanation for the same error of yours is another way that you keep running away. When you do not acknowledge an explanation that is running away. Anyone that follows this thread for more than two pages will simply say "3rd Angel is running away again". By the way, why are you afraid to discuss your excessive exegesis? Think hard what do you base your claims upon?

If you make claims and accusations the burden of proof is on you to prove them. If you cannot you have just shown what you have just said is untruthful. You would be more believable if you could prove what you claim. Sadly you cannot. You are deflecting and running away from a discussion again. Everyone can see it. Thank you for proving my point again. Lets talk more when you have something to contribute to the discussion. So far your failing, but I do think our chats are funny even if your not being truthful in your accusations and claims your unable to prove .

 

[Subduction Zone]

Sorry dear friend but yep @samtonga43 was being honest with you. Why not acknowledge your mistakes, learn from them and move on?

Nope, you will have to wait until she returns. If ever. She may have forgotten, but there was no running away. How she could forget is beyond me.

But meanwhile you are still running away.

Why are you afraid to discuss why your exegesis fails?

 

[Subduction Zone]

If you make claims and accusations the burden of proof is on you to prove them. If you cannot you have just shown what you have just said is untruthful. You would be more believable if you could prove what you claim. Sadly you cannot. You are deflecting and running away from a discussion again. Everyone can see it. Thank you for proving my point again. Lets talk more when you have something to contribute to the discussion. So far your failing, but I do think our chats are funny even if your not being truthful in your accusations and claims your unable to prove .

I awlays prove my points. The one thing that I accuse you of is running away. And you keep confirming it. I sometimes have to chase you with a hundred questions and you still run away. You are running away again.

Why are you afraid to discuss why your exegesis fails? Doesn't the thread rely on your exegesis? When you pretend that a question is not asked that is running away. I never did that once.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not really dear friend. I was not asking you yes and no questions. I specifically asked you to prove your false claims and you failed to do so again proving my point that you make false claims and accusations and when challenged simply show your false claims untruthful and run away. You have been exposed dear friend and everyone can see it now. Lets move one and talk more once you have something to add to the OP.

Oh my sweet Flying Spaghetti Monster! <Ramen> Did I say that it was a yes or no question? The use of the word "no" came from you:

"So that is a no again" It is on this page.

But you continue to run away:

Why are you afraid to discuss why your exegesis fails?

By the way, continually asking you the same question leaves a record of you running away every time that it is not answered.

 

[3rdAngel]

Nope, you will have to wait until she returns. If ever. She may have forgotten, but there was no running away. How she could forget is beyond me. But meanwhile you are still running away. Why are you afraid to discuss why your exegesis fails?

Your deflecting what you do to others SZ. Just own it and move on. Sorry dear friend but @samtonga43 was being honest with you as I am and others here. Why not acknowledge your mistakes, learn from them and move on? Lets talk me when you have something to add to the OP.