Hey doppelgänger,
I saw your post in thread, "Honestly, Why do you need "God"?". I was going to comment there, but thought it'd go from the thread a bit, so I posted it here, if you don't mind.
Your post was:
To mark an irresolvable paradox in the logic of cause and effect. Though marking it with a word that carries such enormous psychological baggage for most people is a sloppy and lazy way to communicate
I'm guilty of that - I use a term for God (meaning Supreme Ultimate Absolute Reality, similar to Tao or Brahman) and yet also for the active participle (archetypical, personal gods (illusions of the mind), Shakti, and so on). I've noticed it brings a lot of confusion though, even possible to me. Is there anything I can do to make communication clearer, and still understandable?