• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gjallarhorn

Gjallarhorn

N'yog-Sothep 33 From Lancaster, PA
Joined
Last seen
Messages
9,777
Reaction score
971

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Godobeyer
    hi i just wonder why you use this two arabic word , they combine non-sense sentence and not correct in grammar !!!
    1137
    Haha they pulled him off well by never explaining the science behind him.
    1137
    It's not the third nor fourth dimension that is the issue, it is the fifth dimension. The fourth dimension does not not exist because we are experiencing the third, but how can there be parallel versions of our lives (on different paths) when you could theoretically follow your life from birth to death in the 4th dimension? If you could move to any point in the fourth dimension, you would see past and future events including your current self. Millionaire you would not be accessible.
    1137
    I've been thinking about the ten dimensions and found a major issue. If we are long, snake like entities fouth dimensionally, a being like Dr. Manhattan in Watchmen is plausible, because if it was somehow possible I could move along my timeline. That leaves no room for different possible paths to emerge.
    dyanaprajna2011
    Lol, not in the least. I think he wants to remain purposefully vague just so that he's hard to understand...or make people think he's deeper than he actually is.
    dyanaprajna2011
    You have a much greater knowledge of Buddhism than he does. He wants to color it with his Christian beliefs, which don't really mesh well together. You actually grasp what Buddhism teaches.
    1137
    Yeah it explains it much better than I could haha. I really have nothing against the views that the platonic solids are a part of reality, more against the idea that we fully understand how so.
    1137
    Apparently it is not a classical dodecahedron, it is explained in the article that you sadly cannot access. But our personal universe that you and I live in does exist in the third dimension, as we exist (perhaps more accurately perceive / experience) in the third dimension.
    1137
    :( that sucks. It's an article about how some scientists are thinking the universe may be finite, may also be in the shape of a dodecehedron. Some of the stuff in the new 10th dimension video made me think of the theory.
    1137
    Have you heard of this?

    The universe may be revealing its shape, new findings suggest
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top