Iti oj

Hey man, its no problem at all.

I'm always down to bounce ideas off a brother of the LHP

Thank you as well.

dude I literally signed in 30 secs after you left chat! I'm in there now.

Thanks for the frublet by the way.

I'll getchya back

Well if one practices chaos magic then they must practice its opposite in order to maintain what it is.

Imagery is useless unless there is an illusion that settles behind it. Even so, illusions are capable of being touched.

I tend to think of it as just...magic.

There doesn't need to be anything else behind it

http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/left-hand-path-religions-dir/130749-copy-paste.html

Maybe this will help :D

Don't get sweaty, Heady. I wasn't able to be there either. No pressure ever dude

No worries, its been a while since I've logged into Starcraft II too. End of semester coursework is always a bit overwhelming. Come May though...video games galore!

I'll get it figured out eventually. Did you try adding me?

I had a professor who never accepts late work accept an assignment that was overdue, got my internet bill paid, finally got some rain after a long drought, I noticed that the land that had been burned by a wildfire in my area was starting to grow some green grass, and saw my first butterfly of spring...so a good Friday the 13th so far! How do I add you Starcraft II by the way?

It was a pretty long way, really. My views evolved freely until 2010 or so, by which I had lost all fear of deities and spirits alike and I broke away from my Christian upbringing. As you know I'd had a bit of a bumpy road with my occult circles, so I believed myself to be completely alone in my world view. I heard about LHP and Satanism not long after, but after that it still took me over a year to admit to myself that might be the group closest to me.
After that I've actually been surprised over how much I agree with many people here. I had expected me to disagree much more.

uh, thanks. though I actually I should be the one welcoming you since I've been around since I've been around since 2007

Thanx for the rampaging frubie!

Hey I'm glad you like my altar. That place I show on the photo is just for deities; offerings are put below, on the table I still have to order and clean! Best wishes.

Hey man! chat?

Don't mind me. I just fell asleep on the bus and woke up in your vst msgs.

Order a pizza.

you welcome my friend , what is the link of your new thread ?

ps... I'd also point out the photo of the Australian is not representative of what Australian natives actually look like, but likely sourced from a early/mid 20th century racist tract. You can find plenty of pictures of Australian natives showing they don't look any less human than the rest of us.
Such images were sadly common up until the 1950's or so as desperate racists sought to validate their views. This is why you never see such an image in color... they were taken prior to the advent of affordable color film. You will also notice the pose in the Australian is twisted in order to produce an exaggerated image, while the European is shown in proper side view.

I would stick with just the fossils and not reconstructions.... the fossils can speak for themselves. Plus, there is almost never simply a scrap of bone. H.erectus is known from hundreds of individuals some very nearly complete. Almost all hominid species are known from several individuals. Plus, thanks to the joy of bilateral symmetry, if you have the right 50% you know the whole skeleton.
I'd also point out that even with just that wolfs skull, you know you are dealing with a wolf... canis lupus and you can tell it's relatedness to other canids and other carnivora.
However, with Neanderthals we can reconstruct their general skin tone and general hair color because we have their DNA... for example we know they had a gene for reddish hair, meaning that at least some of them were ginger.

noachide covenant