• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Ok, I guess it’s my English. Let me try again. I never meant cause-and-effect events in sequence. I don’t mean to throw a single dice multiple time. I meant under same Natural Laws, the number of dice you throw at a time has a huge impact on the outcome/range of possibilities. If you throw 10...
  2. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Ok, I read your post #7564 as well and the article below that you shared “Fractal Evolution”. Fractal Evolution I know now why you said, “I disagree with some of the language in this reference”. But I only wonder if you are pro evolution, why would you share that specific article and encourage...
  3. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Yes, Mutations are not random, but your focus is on outcomes being controlled by Natural Laws and processes (which I don’t disagree with) yet, we cannot ignore the true range of possible outcomes and its significance as it relates to real world observations. For example, if you throw a single...
  4. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    No, we are not on the same page. Let me explain. First, in #7489 I said, “it’s a very rare condition/disorder”, a disorder is not necessarily related to mutation. @ shunyadragon also told you the same about Leucism in his post #7525. Second, in our realm, we always deal with “approximation”...
  5. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    It’s a subjective opinion without any scientific evidence to support that brain cells or connections of brain cells could produce your thoughts, mind or consciousness. There has never been a plausible biological mechanism proposed to account for this. See the article below. Is There Life After...
  6. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Again, all populations of a ring species complex are typically considered/identified as subspecies (not different species) mainly because the concept assumes continual gene flow from end to end. (The concept being false or without examples is another issue that I previously clarified. see #7680...
  7. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    The argument about God has nothing to do with the Modern Synthesis being disproved on scientific bases.
  8. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Seriously? Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology (wiley.com) Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary (royalsocietypublishing.org) See #4087 Darwin's Illusion | Page 205 | Religious Forums
  9. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    All biological systems are irreducibly complex. No exception. You can neither exclude a constituent nor a constituent can be functional or evolve in isolation of the other interdependent constituents as previously explained in # 7495 Darwin's Illusion | Page 375 | Religious Forums And # 7403...
  10. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Nonsense, the context here is the current status of the “Chemistry of Abiotic Nucleotide Synthesis”. What model are you talking about? Read the article. Chemistry of Abiotic Nucleotide Synthesis (acs.org) Nonsense, if you use evolution to refute ring species then you must accept that at least...
  11. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I would enjoy an ethical debate even if we disagree. It would save time. Otherwise, it’s not fun.
  12. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    If you acknowledge that the article explained why these examples are not perfect versions of ring species, then why do disagree with my statement in #7048 “ring species is an over a century old concept with no good examples in the classic sense today”? Again, it’s an idea/concept without good...
  13. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    You are not that ignorant; you intentionally twist the facts to win a false argument. You know I don’t buy such nonsense, so what is your goal? Is it to get the uninformed readers confused? But before you confuse them, you confuse yourself, See #7523 by @ shunyadragon. I appreciate his ethical...
  14. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    No, Natural Laws and natural processes have not always existed. Refer to Lawrence Krauss book “A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing” The main theme of the book is how "we have discovered that all signs suggest a universe that could and plausibly did arise from a...
  15. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Forget about my “defrctive thinking”. Demonstrate how Islam is not creationism! How can creationism be anti science if the Islamic golden age is what brought the modern scientific method to existence? See #7382 Darwin's Illusion | Page 370 | Religious Forums & # 7523 (not my post) Darwin's...
  16. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    It’s not about being clever or claiming personal credit. When you deny something that was never an issue on the table to begin with, you’re the one who brings such thought/idea out; such action exposes the thoughts in your mind and may actually confirm it rather than deny it. Do you understand...
  17. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I didn’t make such claim, but if others did a similar claim, can you verify or confirm beyond doubt whether it did happen or not? The fact is you can’t even if you claim otherwise.
  18. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I do but you don’t have the capacity to understand it. It’s not even an argument. It’s the fact that latest scientific finds disproved the central assumption of the Modern Synthesis. See # 4087 Darwin's Illusion | Page 205 | Religious Forums The ToE is the Modern Synthesis, the MS being...
  19. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Even so we are generally not on the same page, but I don’t recall that I ever saw you intentionally twisting the facts to advance a false narrative or impose an opinion merely because you said so. I appreciate your ethical debate. Compared to others, you’re honest and knowledgeable. These...
  20. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Yes there is. It’s called the ToE. Don’t you know that per the ToE, Tiktaalik is considered the transitional ancestor form fish to four-legged creature (tetrapods) including elephants, giraffe and also humans? Yes, the ToE assumes that fish transformed into elephants. No, I’m a Muslim
View older results
Top