Does “widespread” means minority to you?
In the same lecture, Gerd B. Müller literally said, “this cannot be dismissed as a MINORITY VIEW but rather is a widespread feeling among scientists”. Isn’t that clear enough? Why is the meaningless denial?
Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is...
It’s unfortunate that continuous ad hominem, red herring, unethical debate, fallacious attacks, etc. got me to respond back lately in a manner that contradicts my beliefs and the purpose of my argument. I’m not supposed to engage or waste time in such nonsense but after all, I’m only human. I...
If a living organism is not equipped with what it needs to survive from day one, it will simply not survive till day two. It will not have a million year to somehow get what it needs to survive. If it doesn’t survive, it definitely doesn’t evolve.
Similarly, a non-living organic molecule will...
Didn’t you get it yet? Al the scientists that I’m quoting are evolutionists, no exception, simply because evolutionists like yourself wouldn’t accept otherwise and yes, the record is there for all to see who is cherry picking which you again continue to do by ignoring my response in #2034.
I...
Very true, you actually reminded me of what Gerd B. Müller said in the royal society conference in 2016. See # 911
“Sometimes these challenges are met with dogmatic hostility, decrying any criticism of the traditional theoretical edifice as fatuous, but more often the defenders of the...
Do you know what the real joke is? It’s when a monkey assumes the role of a sleeping dinosaur and plays chess with pigeons! The outcome is hilarious :)
Please don’t get me wrong; it’s only a joke. I know that evolutionists typically accept the idea that they’re monkeys, cousins of horses and...
I used the same info many times before, see # 1245 in case you forget. It's not about the source or credibility, it's about the relevance of the info to your argument. Go back and read #2090. It’s very obvious and clear. I’m sure you get my point. Why do you deny it? Don’t answer me, I know...
What post after #1245? Do you mean your post # 1258? Seriously?
Here is your response #1258 below
Darwin's Illusion | Page 63 | Religious Forums
If you consider that ridiculous nonsense to be a debate, you are really pathetic. it's nothing but some meaningless denial. Go back to #1245, debate...
I think you neither know the proper debate rules nor can decide who is following or not following it. You don’t get to make any rules. Don’t play fallacious tricks merely to win an argument. Have a good night.
No, Stasis dominates the history of most fossil species; PE was not about or limited to single-celled organisms or one year generation species.
Britannica wrote “punctuated equilibrium, a revision of Darwinian theory proposing that the creation of new species through evolutionary change...
Yes, a million years is sudden, but a thousand year is a demolition of gradualism. Do you understand?
punctuated equilibrium model | biology | Britannica