Seriously? Do you consider that a response? Go back to #1520. Read it again, respond to the specific points of my argument or just stop your nonsense.
Anyone with some knowledge about the subject knows that your claim about the confirmation of abiogenesis is nonsense. You’re deceiving no one...
Totally and dishonestly false.
The Miller-Urey experiment neither confirmed the hypothesis of abiogenesis nor confirmed that nucleic acids may form on their own. It merely showed that some organic compounds (amino acids) could form from simpler inorganic matter. That's all the experiment...
You think the Nazis misinterpreted the ToE. I don’t.
The first one who tried to apply the evolutionary ideas on humans is Darwin himself in his book “The Descent of Man”. In that very book Darwin said, “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man...
Nuh uh
Your reply is an escape tactic, not an ethical debate.
Again, the prediction is millions of transitional forms for every organism alive or ever existed on earth. Some challenged examples don’t cut it.
Seriously?
This was Noble’s lecture In the University of Oxford on his book, “The...
Why?
A cause that has an unknown nature beyond the scientific/physical domain is still a cause. Being external to your domain of knowledge/awareness is not a refutation.
The contradiction is the notion that the scientific method demands a cause for everything to end up satisfied with the...
Agreed, the understanding of reality as perceived by humans (or any conscious organism for that matter) is a relative concept dependent on the capacity of sense perception and mental power.
Deep-sea fish that live in the darkness below the sunlit surface waters may not and cannot know what the...
Abiogenesis is a felid of study based on a false assumption without evidence. Abiogenesis holds a false axiom (assumed to be a fact) and uses it as the foundation to build on.
There is no evidence that live of any kind or even a non-living self-replicating genetic material can emerge from...
You may debate that deviations, alterations and misinterpretations had found its way into religions but that is not relevant in any way to the damaging influence driven by the true interpretations of the ToE when applied on humans. The first one who tried to apply the evolutionary ideas on...
False, if the effect did take place, then the cause must exist. Magic is simply a category of causes/mechanisms that are not known/understood but nonetheless must exist.
The notion that what is beyond the domain of science (physical realm) cannot exist is illogical. It’s not logical to insist...
If we are not cognizant of the domain of science (its limits/boundaries). If we try to apply the scientific method within the wrong domain, if we adapt the illogical axiom that whatever beyond our ability to see cannot exist, if we deny the logical necessity that all relative entities must be...
You forgot that it's not my claim. You don’t even question the credibility of those who made the claim, so what is your problem then?
These are articles and lectures published in your mainstream respectful scientific journals, why do you think it was allowed to be published? Your bias clouds...
I don’t deny misinterpretation of Islam but misinterpretation / misinformation about Islam has nothing to do with what Islam is or means for those who know Islam.
Islam was the driving force that established the basis of the new scientific method. Are you even aware that the numbers that you...
Again, all these quotes are by Eldredge and Gould and all of it are concerning the same fact that the fossil record offers no support for gradual change.
Science cannot achieve absolute certainty, statistical proof plays an important role to support the likelihood of a hypothesis, if the...
It’s totally the other way around.
Science postulates that the universe arose from nothing, which is illogical because the existence of the universe as contingent entity (didn’t always exist) is necessarily dependent on a cause. The cause must logically exist.
It may appear, as a conflict...
Yes, there are some areas that sciences don’t cover or cannot answer or explain. Once this understanding settles, then alternative means are necessary to get a better grasp of these areas.
We are relative beings, our capacity of understanding stays within the domain of relative entities. The...
As usual, you’re wrong and confused yet you think you know.
Didn’t I already explain to you in #1351 that both abiogenesis and spontaneous generation are related in the sense that both assumed that life may arose on its own from nonliving matter?
In fact, both abiogenesis and spontaneous...
False, I said many times in my posts that,” species do not go extinct just because a variant emerged.” and you came up with your ridiculous percentage that 99% go extinct. Support your 99% claim or stop the nonsense.
Even if your percentage is correct, where are the surviving 80 million of...
Why the dishonest denial? The Nazis racist ideology was scientifically driven.
The Nazi designated specific people with no right to live to be targeted for murder by the state, including people with serious medical problems, and people with cognitive and physical disabilities, deaf, blind, etc...
Science is not limitless. Science has its own domain, within that domain, science can provide answers/explanations but beyond the boundaries of that domain science no longer applies.
Do you believe that the entire universe popped into existence from nothing at the Big Bang about 14 billion...
You don’t know who Louis Pasteur was?
I find it very strange that you never came across the name of such renowned scientist, the father of microbiology whose work was credited with saving hundreds of millions of lives across the globe.