Lenski’s “Escherichia Coli” experiment (#680) didn’t include any drugs designed to kill the bacteria. The change was not necessary for survival that is why it didn’t happen sooner or in all population and even when it happened, it was an activation of an existing but previously silent citrate...
I did provide yotube, links to the articles and the PDF of the entire lecture. On the other hand, you respond with excuses and some unsubstantiated claims of yours.
Unsubstantiated claims provide your evidence.
As I said many times, I specifically quote evolutionists who submit to the ruling...
A biological species is a group of organisms that can reproduce naturally with one another and create fertile offspring. This is not my definition; it’s the biological definition of " species”.
Different species, which CAN interbreed, but simply don't, would not produce fertile offspring...
So we agreed on the point of discussion that the ToE (MS) has failed and need a replacement. I never argued that Gerd B. Müller is advocating for God! Did I?
He said:
“A rising number of publications argue for a major revision or even a replacement of the standard theory of evolution...
Maybe or maybe not, I never claimed that the belief in God is immune to false interpretations or false alterations/deviations. It’s a separate argument irrelevant to the influence of the ToE.
I guess you are not trying to make an irrelevant fourth grader’s argument, “you did wrong so that makes...
You’re again bringing the fourth grader argument “ you did bad so I can”
Religious texts inspired humanity in one way or another, how is that relevant to the negative impact of the ToE?
One important aspect to consider is whether the inspiration is driven by true or false interpretation of the...
If religious texts impacted humanity in one way or another, how is that relevant to the impact of the ToE? You’re bringing the fourth grader argument “ you did bad so I can”
Again, I’m not advocating any naturalistic revamping. Its not my concern. Its your imagination, I’m only declaring the...
If you accept that divine creation is involved in the process, then we have nothing to argue about.
#490 was not about fine-tuning of the universe but indeed its one of the most important examples of intelligent design.
Fine-tuning the Universe | Nature
Fine-Tuning (Stanford Encyclopedia of...
Sure, but the point is that a single option on the table as the only viable option necessarily establishes a priori or an axiom that impacts perceived relationships by the observer, bias becomes inevitable. Which drives all interpretations of all observations in the sense that all...
As I said before, I’m quoting these scientists not only because they are scientists of the highest caliber but also because they are all evolutionists without any bias to my side of the argument.
I’m quoting them for their specific solid scientific arguments such as the evidence of molecular...
No, you have to differentiate between the original purpose of the theory and the actual influence/impact of the theory.
The influence of the evolutionary concept indeed extends beyond biology to encompass social science, social psychology, philosophy and politics with respect of adapted...
The main argument is about the ToE being false but the negative influence of the theory on humanity came up as a side argument, some denied it and the argument continued.
Social Darwinism & Eugenics are both product of the evolutionary concept.
Social Darwinism & Eugenics itself are among the...
Science can only deal with what can be observed or experiment with. If it’s beyond the ability to investigate, it’s necessarily beyond the jurisdictions of science.
A system has to exist before it can be experiment with. Science stops at the beginning of the universe at the Big Bang. similarly...
You don’t have to; you may just focus on yours.
It’s the other way around. I provide evidence. You provide meaningless opinion.
Deficient understanding as explained numerously. The influence of the evolutionary concept indeed extends way beyond biology to encompass social science, social...
Simple, variables at play in nature follow rigid natural laws. Mutations are directed as explained numerous times.
See #781.
Darwin's Illusion
If #781 is very long to read, then see this short YouTube video.
If you don’t trust a short video and want to see the entire lecture, here it is. See...
The point is about the specific understanding of an ancestor in the context of evolutionary biology. Not the general meaning in the language.
In the context of evolutionary biology, transformation takes place gradually through speciation. If speciation happens, the ability of interbreeding...
With respect to the ToE, I never declare opinions. I provide substantiated facts.
Here is some of what Gerd B. Müller said in the royal society conference in 2016 “A rising number of publications argue for a major revision or even a replacement of the standard theory of evolution, indicating...
Social Darwinism & Eugenics are both product of the evolutionary concept.
Social Darwinism & Eugenics itself are among the negative impacts of the evolutionary concept on humanity.
Is it because you said so? You ignore provided evidence and when I tried to keep things simple for you by focusing on a single point, you continue to act as if you didn’t see it.
If you want to be taken seriously, respond to the last single item in # 1029.
Nothing is random.
I didn’t avoid...
How can you make such a claim? Eugenics is inspired by Evolution and would not exist without Evolution.
Galton had discovered what he called regression to the mean, which posed a dilemma for him. How was natural selection going to work if traits under selection were always regressing to the...