If you want to use logical reasoning, start with the correct “quote”. You quoted my response to Dan about his claim that I don’t like science, it was not about dogmatic control.
Is “the pressure on journalists not to side against evolutionists” a rejection by a scientific body?
Is the...
here is the link for the retracted article that I mentioned in #202 about the human hand
Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living (plos.org)
You’re sidetracking from the subject of my post “How genetically similar are humans to chimpanzees". Read further if you will, then we may have a rational argument.
What global claim? If you mean “dogmatic control”, I did support it. In fact, the non-objective conclusion as clarified, proves...
If you read further, you would see that my opinion is supported. You’re not making a rational argument. I get you don’t want to read, others will do.
You just demonstrated an example of jumping to illogical conclusion because of presuppositions that hinder the ability of logical reasoning...
How genetically similar are humans to chimpanzees? What is the significance of the similarity?
Under dogmatic control, scientific findings are typically interpreted to fit the presuppositions. the conclusion always precedes the experiment.
Genetic comparison of humans and chimpanzees is no...
What is objective evidence? How can it be categorized as objective?
All perceived realities reside only in the human mind. In that sense, it’s a relative concept unless we can some how successfully identify the absolute reality independent of mind.
“Objective” is not a product of science. It’s...
You’re not making any rational argument but rather playing physiological tricks to confuse uninformed readers.
These are Scientists of the highest caliber bringing the latest in the field to these international conferences. They are evolutionists without any bias to the other side of the...
Nice name but its more like “return of the Zombie”, the EES is another attempt to bring a dead theory back to live. Others are happy with it as is regardless of the challenges. Simply, because they know that the EES would demolish the fundamental principals of the original theory.
You didn’t notice that I referenced 2012 international conference of physiological sciences.
Denis Noble declared “It is difficult (if not impossible) to find a genome change operator that is truly random in its action within the DNA of the cell where it works. All careful studies of mutagenesis...
When did I say that the ToE evolutionary process is linear? See# 112, I said “It’s important to understand that the claimed evolutionary process is not linear.” You and Valjean didn’t understand what I meant by linear. I meant, it’s not a rational plan to transform an organism over the...
The analytical interpretation of data is a relative product of the human mind. It’s never an absolute fact. Strong mainstream presupposition significantly impact scientist’s ability of neutral interpretation. The reasons why people or scientists choose or insist to believe in one idea or...
Absolutely correct, it is an imaginative theory that many choose to accept at face value regardless of evidence against it.
It’s important to understand that the claimed evolutionary process is not linear. In other words, it’s not a purposeful gradual plan to give a species specific heritable...
Absolutely, it's neither blind nor purposeless but typically evolutionists insist it is.
The neo-Darwinian theory of evolution, which is firmly based on the natural selection of random mutations, should be an obsolete theory since Non-Random Directed Mutations were confirmed. Cells have...
True, neither Darwin nor modern science claimed to explain live
The DNA is made of a phosphate group, a sugar group and one of four types of nitrogen bases
The nitrogen based molecules are the same in the DNA of all organisms, regardless, if you have access to all available nonliving matter on...
Making sense is not relevant to the claimed evolution process,
Evolution = random mutations + blind, purposeless natural selection.
Gene switches provide a mechanism that regulates gene expression by controlling where, when, and to what degree a specific gene is activated. In other words, it...
Darwin lived in a time when spontaneous generation (formation of living organisms without descent from similar organisms) was believed to be true. In fact, Louis Pasteur disproved the theory of spontaneous generation on 1859, Same year when Darwin published “the Origin of Species”. Also at that...
Can you explain which part you don’t agree with and why?
God is not physical and definitely not human. Whatever you think of or imagine, will always be something physical that exists within the limits of space-time, God is beyond this realm and absolutely not subject to any physical limits...
-We are altogether here 100%.
-We, everything around us and the entire universe is causally dependent 100%.
-The cause beyond the Big Bang is essentially of a nature beyond our knowledge/imagination 100%.
-Beyond space-time itself 100%.
-With no beginning, no cause, no limits %100.
- An...