You are not presenting the evidence because you have none to present.
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time." Abraham Lincoln
I honestly do not understand why Tb finds it so difficult to admit what is patently obvious; she made a mistake when she said that KWED considers whatever opinion he agrees with to be fact.
She was wrong, and we can all see that she was wrong, but she is not big enough to admit she is wrong.
They are attacked? This is a forum where poster A. presents her /his beliefs and opinions and poster B. responds. I am wondering if 'attack' is the correct word to use in these circumstances.
For example, #1378 is a cogent argument which could not be described by anyone rational as...
***
1. Tb says: It is a false belief of islam that Muhammad is the last messenger.
2. Sam says: It is a false belief of Bahai that MrB is the latest messenger.
Tb tells us that both 1. and 2. are bald assertions unless backed up with proof and (being Tb) goes on to explain what a bald...
So you are saying that you don't know which parts of Bahaism you disagree with?
And you don't know which specific writings of Bahaullah you do not agree with?
Of course you're not obligated to do what I ask you to do, However, I would have thought that your own integrity would compel you to back up your own statement.
Obviously not.
A group of men have decided, based on the words of a man who believes that God spoke to him, on something with which Tb disagrees, but accepts. This is not ignorance on my part, Tony. This is ignorance on the part of Tb.
To which ‘type’ of Christianity are you referring? What basis do you...