This is not "culture" nor is it a matter of "convenience".
It's a matter of paraphyletic grouping following a specific definition with established criteria.
Whales don't match the criteria. No tetrapods do.
Except that there are.
You're acting out and engaging in rather ridiculous conspiracy.
"the democratic party" doesn't compose digital newsfeeds of facebook or whatever other digital platform. Algorithms do, based on online activity of the user in question.
It's the same reason why you are served with russian and...
What feed are you talking about?
Digital newsfeeds are typically composed by algorithms based on your online history. It "guesses" your interests and pushes stories accordingly.
Spend a week or two actively looking up data, articles, video's about ukraine and chances are rather huge that...
Yes, dodge.
We were talking about morphology and you dodged it and started about behavior and cognitive abilities (which are a direct result of larger cranial capacity, which you even tried to downplay as "mere difference in size").
Also, at its base, the difference in ability is actually a lot...
Many people aren't naturally blonde. Do you consider that a moral issue of "deception" as well?
Why do you care so much?
Yes, I agree with that.
I disagree. I would say that secular / humanistic morality is about as close to "objective morality" as it gets, since it is based on objective...
You say "yes" as if you agree and then proceed to say the opposite of what he said.
The grouping is not arbitrary.
The name chosen for the group is arbitrary.
The grouping is not
And yet when you replied to the post in question, you did not acknowledge your mistake and in fact did the opposite: you tasked me to try and point out an error, while the error was being pointed out in that exact post. Which you completely ignored.
False.
Google the paraphyletic definition...
You said tuna is in the lineage of lobe-finned fish and sarcopterygii ("the yellow line").
I just showed you black on white how you are wrong in the very post you are replying to.
So yeah, not sure what else to tell you.......................
If you can't figure out your mistake from that...
The "special" status of the find, is that it was found at all by prediction in the predicted strata with the predicted features.
Nobody said anything else about it. It's you that then went all-in on this argument to argue for the sake of arguing.
Your projection is hilarious.
That "newspaper" has a very strange definition of the word "forced" and you a very strange definition of the word "forbade".
Did you also read the part where the Ukrainian source said it would have required altering the Ukrainian constitution AND that they didn't trust Russia to hold up its end...
She shared a post on social media straight from the Russian propaganda mill, saying the Russian invasion was "necessary" because Ukraine was going to develop biological weapons with the help of the US to attack Russia.
She also went to Syria to have a friendly meeting with Assad after she...