• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. ChieftheCef

    I found a sort of god that I predict can't be "disproven" by atheist but it's not Jesus or Buddha etc

    Actually, there is, nothing created everything according to science. And it fits the bill of Monad, Animating Force, Supreme God, Underlying Principle, etc. whatever you want top call it.
  2. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    ANd they were not monotheists, they each have their own interpretation of religion that their governments follow suite. They were affected by enlightenment principles. ONly those who don't want to see don't see. I have shown in the thread. Read the thread.
  3. ChieftheCef

    I found a sort of god that I predict can't be "disproven" by atheist but it's not Jesus or Buddha etc

    I didn't invent it, I found it and confirmed it with entheogenic substances and trance states and mediation and everything else. The problem is your machine is a machination of imagination, nothing is a real scientific phenomena.
  4. ChieftheCef

    I found a sort of god that I predict can't be "disproven" by atheist but it's not Jesus or Buddha etc

    Oh we do! Imagine junkies. They had bad trauma, etc, so they make the most of nothing. They know that their drugs will help them with their trauma. So they take them. They don't realize that the feeling dulls with age and so they don't take breaks and then use. They are making the most of...
  5. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    AI is typical in not givvinjg the whole truth. Remember how dependent it is on humans. Search harder No, they are not. Read the thread!
  6. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    The civilizations I mention are full of that. Did you not hear who I said it was. Rome. Egypt the longest-standing civilization. Greece which housed Alexander the Great, Athens and Sparta. Mesopotamia which housed the first empire. Do you know what the Hebrews had to do for Solomon? Lie about...
  7. ChieftheCef

    I found a sort of god that I predict can't be "disproven" by atheist but it's not Jesus or Buddha etc

    Next reply. Also, how is that not going to get a strike against them?
  8. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    We don't need it, we can infer it based on this: The Christians when Christianizing Rome made friends with and then stabbed in the back the Stoics by their outlawing. They have a history of bad behavior toward these outsider groups when they are in control. They burned Giordano Bruno for...
  9. ChieftheCef

    I found a sort of god that I predict can't be "disproven" by atheist but it's not Jesus or Buddha etc

    I wrote them into a sort of poem What is all encompasing, infinite and eternal? Comes before anything and is after if tomorrow comes? That which is within and without? Which composes all things? Who seems empty but is never exhausted? Who is colourless, who has no form and looks like no...
  10. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    I wanna emphasize I don't mean to be mean spirited to you guys. Dealing with monotheism is especially drastic because it makes threats against not only our lives but also the lives of civilization and society. I also don't have my caffeine right now. Asking to be a buttered up face is honestly...
  11. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/lindsaykohler/2023/11/28/finally-proof-that-happiness-does-make-us-work-better/?sh=77fe09e168a0 These are the sources I can give but if you're gonna say gay people were perfectly happy with Christianity, etc, you're proving to everyone that you actually have a...
  12. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    This is an argument. This has not necessarily been studied.
  13. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    Sheerly trading does not make you open. Those Christian societies burned people to keep their faulty paradigm floating. Don't pretend to ignore history with me.
  14. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    It's really just an argument. Pay attention if you can, otherwise, why are you even seeking? See playing with the free market is what Nature does. She let's each organism, and even nonlifeform, choose the challenges for sustainment, think food or money, and they form great beauty out of her...
  15. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    Christianity burned homosexuals for jerking off. They did not benefit from this. But there are other even more surprising things the other could not do or be. Even down to things LIKE (like you pack a vultures) wearing two clothes at the same time. And they really just did.
  16. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    It's really just what happened in history. It's why the United States and the West have the best economic system, they all used ideas like assimilation of the other and freedom. If you look through the thread you'll see why. The Hebrews hate the other, as does Islam and other monotheist...
  17. ChieftheCef

    Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable

    Egypt also economically declined, in part, by Christianity and Islam when it entered their sphere. Same with the Mesopotamians. Same with the Romans.
  18. ChieftheCef

    Does any supernatural god exist?

    Also, dawg, that's all rehash from the successful Mesopotamians. See my post here for understanding of why they were so successful: Monotheism is not economically, or socially viable
Top