you said: "President Obama signed an executive order mandating transgender access to all public facilities designated to the gender of which they identify."
the order doesn't say anything like that no matter how you twist it.
Here is Obama's Executive Order
and here is the original order as...
you said that that Republicans are "forced to look at everyone else's rights before their own."
I asked what rights and you gave a reply that did nothing to address your claim
We have 11 months of white history. Black History Month was started because that history was being completely ignored. SOme still do their very best to ignore it
Here is the text of the executive order. As anyone can read it says nothing of the sort.
I know some conservative religious groups were terribly upset about this. They complained about how their right to discriminate against people they choose to hate is being infringed on
The first...
I recognize Aiden Clark. He was killed in a vehicle accident. Trump and Vance tried to claim he was murdered by a Hattian immigrant. Aiden's parents have requested Trump and Vance stop lying and to stop using the death of their child as a political tool to spread racism.
So exactly what...
There was no such executive order. Or such a mandate. Obama did write a letter on May 13, 2016 affirming the administration's stance that all students are protected from discrimination by title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX)...
The picture was posted as "proof" of the claim that Trump doesn't hate trans people. As if a photo op negates all of the anti trans statements and the attacks on trans individuals.
There are a lot of pictures of Trump with Epstein. Again so what?
Fascism's origins are complex and include many seemingly contradictory viewpoints, ultimately centered on a mythos of national rebirth from decadence. Fascism was founded during World War I by Italian national syndicalists who drew upon both left-wing organizational tactics and right-wing...
I didn't
no one said anything about verification. You asked about objective evidence of transgenderism
"or are they just taking their words for it" shows your question is far less that legitimate and exists to be dismissive.
I have problems with loaded agenda driven questions
You basically asked if there was any objective evidence that transgenderism exists and you got provided an answer. All you did here was dismiss the answer and try to turn being trans into some sort of petty whim. so much for your claims about just being curious.