True, but here we have two statements; one which is double unproven, i.e. God is omnipotent, which states that there is a God who also is omnipotent, If it is proven that such a claim exists, then follows another statement/question, of whether he can can make an unliftable by him object.
Your question is invalid. Miracles can not violate the law of non-contradiction because they are framed as a miraculous events, which by definition, lie outside the scope of natural laws and logical constraints. The principle of non-contradiction applies to logical and natural phenomena within a...
True, especially in old times. People were taught religion by their parents, who in turn were taught by their own parents. They didn't have, or it was very difficult for them to have, the means to check if what they were told was true. This all changed with the knowledge revolution brought by...
Because most theists still believe that physical phenomena are God's punishment for human actions and the return of a God will solve all these matters.
The virgin birth is almost definitely a made-up story. It is easy to understand this because it is based on a completely irrelevant story or 'prophecy' from Isaiah 7:14. This 'prophecy' is described in the text as a sign from God for King Ahaz, indicating that his two enemies will not attack...
You misunderstood my whole point. I just told you what Christians believe that their Bible states. Jesus in the NT says himself a few times that he will return (unlike your claim which is a lie). In fact Jesus predicted three times that he will return during the lifetime of his disciples. Also...
I don't believe in the Bible, neither in Satan/demons, but your statement "The irony is that Jesus never promised to return to earth, not even once in the New Testament." is completely false. Even John contradicts himself.
Again, Paul opens his letters in 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians...
Your statement above is completely wrong; don't know where you got this idea from...
I showed to you the other day that Jesus was clearly the Son if Man and explicitly said so in Mark's gospel... Also the “Son of Man” in the Gospels was inserted for Jesus because of the “one like a son of man”...