I would insert a sarcastic question about you beating your wife here, but I fear you'd take it as a "personal insult."
That depends. Poland is part of the EU, so if it wants to benefit from being part of that organization it needs to follow the rules of that organization.
See above.
I kind...
The irony of you saying this to me is staggering.
Do you understand the distinction? If you do, you wouldn't support a Muslim immigration ban. But you do. Physician, heal thyself!
In America? Not even ****ing close. They are literally outlawing abortion in this country because their religion tells them it's murder.
But go off about Muslims. :rolleyes:
Not at all. I want to have immigration laws that are based on evidence rather than fear and xenophobia and ignorance. You understand that immigration laws change over time, yes? They aren't eternal.
But they haven't. And repeatedly insist they don't want to. So again, either it's a big conspiracy, or maybe there's more nuance (you like nuance, right?) to Islam than you want to admit.
There are still plenty of Christian fubdamentalists in the world. Right now, there are vastly more of them...
It's "woke" not to want to make discriminatory immigration laws based purely on someone's religion but rather on actual, evidence-based security reasons, like criminal history? Jesus Christ.
It isn't "my definition."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia
I can't wait!
There are over 4 million Muslims living in the US alone. What sects are they part of? I'm not aware of a mass movement among them to turn us into a theocracy. So either you don't understand their religion or...
No, I'm sorry, but it isn't. Practicing Muslims live in the West right now. Say you understand this. If so, then logically you ought to comprehend that there are versions of Islam, and by extension sharia, compatible with Western societies.
Why only immigrants?
Baha'i isn't technically...
It happens quite a lot when discussions of gayness occur, here and elsewhere. Particularly among social conservatives. Gayness is reduced to male gayness and male gayness is reduced to butt stuff. Sigh.
Yet you want to ban them from immigration to the West, because they won't disown part of their religion, even if it's compatible with secular law.
Yet I can't remember the last thread you made critical of some other religion's laws. Nor have I heard you call for prohibitions on Jewish or...
This thread started with a question of why homosexuality is wrong and has ended up as a debate on anal sex.
Do people forget that lesbians exist? Do people forget that there is more to being a gay man than ****ing each other up the ***?
Even if we take exaggerated fear-mongering about anal...
*spits out coffee*
LOL YES, we can! But it would require you to abandon silly hardline ideas like forcing all Muslims who immigrate to the West to "disavow Sharia."
So by all means, please, be nuanced. I can't wait to see it!
That isn't true though. There are explicitly secular and liberal Muslims in the world.
Is this how you feel about Jewish halakha and Catholic canon law? Why does only Islamic sharia draw your criticism?
Lol it seems as though you're the one unaware that we have long had strict immigration...
So it sounds like you're in agreement with me that there's nothing weird or confusing about water preceding life, despite @Eli G's objections.
I'm glad we can agree on something!
Muslims have competing ideas about sharia law. They're not all the same. So no, that standard is silly and unnecessary. Many law-abiding Muslims live in Western countries right now with no issues.
Go outside.
The people immigrating from the Middle East to Europe are immigrating to get away from Islamist rule. Why would you blame them for the ideologies they're running away from? If you want more people to accept Western values, keeping them out like they're lepers is not wise. Embracing them and...