Yes, we're all familiar with the dishonest practice of selecting a handful of verses out of context, in order to discredit an entire religion. It's calculated to mislead, and it's intellectually lazy.
Killing in the name of religion generally requires men to ignore the dogma and doctrines, since love, mercy, compassion and justice are core values in most of the world’s religions.
Not sure why you only see the bad in religion, but never the good? Is that because, more generally, you see the...
It seems most improbable to me that a universe governed by precise and immutable law, manifesting in such intricately glorious kaleidoscopes of form, came to be without an underlying creative intelligence. So magnificent a symphony simply has to have a composer.
No, that doesn’t sound like wisdom at all, and of course you know it doesn’t, which rather proves my point. Presumably you have lived long enough to acquire a little wisdom, and even exercise it from time to time. Even if only enough to recognise how scarce a commodity it is.
Yes, the evaluation of wisdom is entirely subjective, that's the point. Since we experience life subjectively, we have no trouble recognising subjective phenomena. It's objectivity we struggle with, since no objective paradigm is available to us experientially. Truth and knowledge are, at least...
I don’t really watch the news, precisely because doing so is not good for my mental health. I do keep abreast of the news, by reading one or two trusted papers and journals, but I avoid the relentless wall to wall horror show on TV news; and I deleted AppleNews from my phone, to avoid doom...
Laws can’t be properties. Either they arise from those properties which entities exhibit when interacting with each other, or they determine the nature of those interactions.
If, as you said above, the laws of physics are the basis of causality and cannot themselves be caused, then the laws of...
So the laws themselves are fundamental? Since the laws of physics are mostly mathematical formulae, does this mean that the physical world is governed by an ideal realm of underlying, perfect abstraction, as suggested by Plato (and Roger Penrose)?
That’s not a less loaded way of asking the same question, it’s a completely different question. What I am questioning is, Why are there regularities in nature for us to observe?
The statement “as long as there are things, there will be a way things work” is meaningless. It assumes that nature...