We are not merely discussing the current numbers, we are talking about cumulative numbers and only in the last few years have we had groups keeping up with the numbers. This means that exact numbers are impossible to know. Scaling my numbers down does not change the core argument so I went ahead...
I am aware of what I typed. You keep obsessing about the terms "all manner of evil" so I keep trying to clarify it using different descriptions. I hope we can move past this at this point. I can't ring any more clarifications out of these terms. It causes a lot of suffering in quite a few...
I didn't say I could not find some numbers. I intact provided 3 links. I said no one I know of has exact figures. For one thing no one was around previous to a hundred years ago that kept these statistics.
We are not discussing bisexualism nor heterosexuality nor anything in between. This is a...
Your distinction made no difference so I saw no reason not to lower my figures to keep from having to haggle over them. There I such a thing as homosexual sex and it must have some significant differences because it is far more destructive than what heterosexuals do.
I can't believe we are still circling the semantic drain pipe. I used the word "many" exactly like what I told you. A significant amount or a number larger than what I would expect if homosexuality is determined before birth. You may have thought I meant the word "many" in another way but you...
My claims follow the facts. The rates that heterosexual acts result in new aids cases are unbelievably low compared to those same acts when performed by homosexuals therefor there must be a difference between these two acts. When 4% of a population produces 67% of new aids cases and 96% produce...
No, that's my interpretation of the following verse:
New International Version
God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good
If you want to do...
Ok, since you wont stuff I am implementing a 3 step plan.
Step one is to clearly tell you what I am going to do.
Step 2 is to put you on my ignore list.
Step 3 is to report you for trolling.
We are at step one. I do not want to have a discussion with you at this time. Not in any thread. So...
Stuff like this has no part in a debate. This is color commentary not an argument. I have no emotion of desire what so ever concerning this issue. I just find the massive costs of homosexuality unjustified by its "merits".
More color commentary. Do you even remember what the argument was?
This...
I am simply following the same rules used for professional debates. It is the burden of the first one to be asked to justify their claims to knowledge. Only after that is done do I have a burden.
Yes, once someone calls a specific claim into question I follow up with a clarification. This is...
You are the truth. What in the world is that supposed to mean?
Yes all claims about external realities are beliefs. We supposed to be showing why our beliefs are the best inferences to a conclusion. Your simply telling me what you believe is not the best inference to a conclusion. It's...
I was not the one that ended the discussion. If anyone was running it wasn't me. However I said that the other person's quitting was a good opportunity to cease the debate. "Good out" is a common enough expression.
God made the original sheep like animals, horse like animals, and cow like animals. Over the course of time these types of animals changed within their type or "kind". Some of these were domesticated. It is very hard to take biblical words and find to exact corresponding taxonomy terms for them...
Thanks but I am probably too lazy to utilize the site.
Ok but I still am not sure why your harping on the semantics here.
I did not anticipate anyone calling me out for my word choice here so I wasn't being hyper technical.
Why do you think a person using a term as ambiguous as many...
Where did you get that GIF from?
You made a claim roughly contrary to mine. I think "attempted to counter" is a better word for it but who cares. Why are we circling the semantic drain?
Many is simply a linguistic tool which has no objective standard. I used it to suggest a significant...
I get so tired of these emotional responses. If you don't like "condemned" how about "attempted to counter".
I was already asked how many to which I gave a link. It should be easy to find. It is very near to the post where I made the claim to begin with. I have no idea (nor does probably...
Now your inventing bias that doesn't exist. You are a true lefty. My analogy was the first one to pop into mind. There was no sinister plan. Why are you butt hurt all the time? The length of these posts is already creeping beyond what I sked you for.
I didn't do so to start with you just view...
Yes, but the person is only required to me that burden if another requests it be met which I have. So you need to provide your burden then if you want you can request I meet any burden I have.
As stated above I required you to meet your burden first therefor you have the initial obligation...