The only doctrine that is not being religious is Naturalist. Those who completely hear and obey Natural Order. They are not being religious because the universal order is not a Religion.
Accordingly, you are making an argument and have a burden of proof for completely hear and obey Natural...
Does it seem that Atheist have misunderstood the word God, perhaps?
Definition of GOD
1 capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: such as
a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe
b Christian Science : the incorporeal...
Fine, that is one of the elements from the official definition of Atheism.. .There are two other elements which make one as an Atheist. The definition #151 Atheism is a Religion . #6 #32 #37 #41
So what is your argument on the other twos?
Asking you to prove
1. Energy can be created
2. Energy cannot be destroyed
3. Energy cannot be transferred.
is an insult?
Asking you to verify your claim (being educated) which is clearly contradicted the definition of Energy in Physic in an insult? Stop being educated, and starts with being...
There is no point of repetition and you can read the first post, #151 and . #6 #32 #37 #41.
The official definition of Atheism said "God (s)"..
It does not say Allah, Jesus, Lord Shiva etc? It says God or Gods... There are 320,000,000 Gods on Earth. Hinduism alone has 33,000,000 Gods. Some say...
Because I'm a Matheist. ... I make all gods same god. That is my religion, QURANIC ANIMISM.
He made all gods same god. (Quran 38:5)
so there is no point for an Atheist to feel they are SUPREME or better than anyone else in this world when they themselves are living their "Magical Fairies"...
Simply because you cannot understand the difference between "Education" and "Intellect". You can do better than this.
You claim the value of everything is "0". Therefore proves:
1. Energy can be created
2. Energy cannot be destroyed
3. Energy cannot be transferred.
I did and you merely address the issue of "lack of belief", which Dawkins defined as "equiprobable, skeptic, and improbable"... which means "belief in Gods".
You absolutely ignore the issue of "disbelief in Gods", which infers the set of atheist's belief to counter the belief in Nature's God...