I don't think it is tinkering with creation as with a badly made car, it is making sure that those parts of creation that can't just fall into place by themselves, actually do get done.
Science has the rule that if it cannot find a God or maker or designer then the only possible answers that...
I really don't think science would draw any lines.
When listening to James Tour he makes it sound so reasonable that it is so hard and such precision work to synthesize chemicals, that wanting nature to do it is a nonsense, considering what it would mean in practice. He says that in the...
No it was not said to support the Trinity. It supports, and also your "whether it is true or not" supports my contention about Baha'is and the Bible.
The fruit of a false prophet.
Acts 1:9 After he said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight.
10 They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11 “Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into...
Yes the Word was spirit and became flesh, iow became a man.
NIV Heb 1:1 In the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the...
OK I don't need to have made a logical argument to have made a logical fallacy.
But really don't you think the whole idea of logical fallacies is overdone and overused and sometimes so vague that it is not even explained. It is like throwing sh*t and hoping some sticks,,,,,,,,,,,, which...
I'm including whatever reasons theists have for believing in God and/or their God.
Bible prophecies are many and can be quite specific and shown to have been fulfilled.
I know the ideas are unverifiable and unfalsifiable and everyone wants to say it is acceptable as science,,,,,,,,,,,,,, including those people who reject ideas of God because God cannot be verified or falsified.
I have not seen the beginnings of the universe or life explained yet, have you...
It helps if you believe what the Bible tells us about Jesus and not just what people think about the Trinity teaching and the Roman Catholic Church.
Most Baha'is seem willing to ignore the Bible.
25 minutes of Sy Garte saying that the ToE is probably right but not without a designer and that abiogenesis probably needed a designer also.
Another 24 minutes or so of Q and A time.
So we get to the end of your post and you show me a typical cognitive bias of atheists, the denial that evidence for God and the Bible can be anything other than objective, demonstrable, repeatable, testable evidence.
You want this sort of evidence for a being who is not part of this material...
Sorry your post was too long and all over the place for me to follow well.
There is nothing in the ASA statement of faith which shows that it or Sy Garte are cognitively biased imo.
Certainly investigating areas relating Christian faith and science does not mean cognitive bias and looking at...
I shouldn't be arguing against evolution even if it may be not 100% true.
Your faith is that it is true and I suppose 100% true.
Your faith I suppose cannot deal with the suggestion that ToE is not 100% accurate when someone say that a designer and maker was needed for at least parts of it...
The reason for the origin of life being a problem is that science ends up saying that life is only chemistry for a start.
For a Bible believer, life is not just chemistry and is given by God.
I watched this video in the thread you posted.
True it is something that a normal lay person could...
It's possible that you are right but you also need to remember that any hypothesese for something like this are educated guesses with naturalistic answers as the only possibilities in science.
It is true however that if chance has been kind and something in the genes has afforded some degree of...
Maybe that is true, but some these days use ToE to deny the Bible and so the Bible God.
I don't know. I hear that for evey question and problem answered there appear more questions and problems, and so abiogenesis is further from their goal these days.
Maybe let @It Ain't Necessarily So say what he thinks.
All I did was comment on what Sy Garte probably meant.
Yes if you believed that it is all naturalistic then you would see God input as special pleading.
But if you understand that science does not show a universe that came into being...