I wondered if it was bogus because of how the whole thing read but then noticed the links leading to more information. There’s major caveats with it not least the issue of homochirality which is big let alone the lifelessness of the precise small molecules needed to begin with. It is a very...
Furthermore the article ends with this:
"If life emerged on Earth via this simple path, then it also likely emerged on Mars," said Benner. "This makes it even more important to seek life on Mars as soon as we can."
Is it genuine or bogus. They sound mentally ill also.
Small molecules are inanimate, as inanimate as Lego pieces. Have Lego pieces ever been observed to self assemble, even ‘mix‘ under their own volition? Try spending some considerable time critically thinking about that.
Organic synthesis is something I know about. It is amazing the number of academics that actually (may) believe this can happen randomly in nature. I read one worked on one of the smaller molecules a year after I left the same department in Manchester. Thankfully I found God later having left...
It’s an assertion on your part ToE is right. Humans haven’t got the remains of an egg production gene, this part of human DNA is just different that’s all. The origin of DNA is of fundamental importance to understanding where life comes from. It is mathematically impossible for DNA to make...
Every living creature here on earth has DNA. You have no idea where that came from thus your evidence is no good. Comparing the DNA differences between creatures is an in exact science and doesn’t disprove the Creator God.
The figures I gave between harmful (99.999%) and so called beneficial (0.001%) were accurate calculations based on theotretical evidence from an ’expert’ in the field posted by another. Your theory is ridiculous comparing those figures.
You haven’t read the Biblical narrative carefully, clearly have no idea what the earth was like before the flood, was there an ‘everest’ or a Mariana Trench? The Bible infers the earth was reshaped. You have no idea how long it took Noah to build the ark or what help he had. The ingathering of...
The question was why do bad mutations die out quickly. Figures bandied around on here suggest there are 99.999% bad mutations compared with 0.001% being described as beneficial. Looking at those figures they won’t die out quickly by having ‘fewer in each generation’ and would affect ‘survival’...
That first link says: “Scientists agree that many questions remain unanswered but the chimp genome provides important clues to understanding what makes us human.”
Do you know what the difference in proteins they both produce?
The differences and similarities? According to the Nature article there is a difference of 83% in respective DNA and apes only produce 29% of the same proteins that humans do.