‘Lucy’ shows the daftness of the imagination of man. Bones, only 40% complete and they go fabricate a fairytale story with them. I’m not going to discuss the fantasy of using dating methods with you again. Those bones are likely actually to come from a female human. The fragments of skull, how...
I cannot debate this obsessive lying and constant pithy, distortion of the truth.
Richard Dawkins approves many comedians for his annual award. Another reason not to take this type of atheist pretending to know about science seriously.
You’ve misquoted me which is against your rules. But this paper asserts proof of the concept of natural selection (and ergo humans evolving from animals). Natural selection is nonsense of course and with just common observation hair colour changes in humans without natural selection...
Everything you have given involves hypothesis. To reiterate, hypothesis upon hypothesis never produces fact, only confusion. Moreover, if someone actually observes a change of say hair colour for example, in any animal in the field, it doesn’t confirm humans came from animals. This is the level...
That is not what I asked was it. By your response we proved it is only hypothesis and has no factual basis. Unfortunately you cannot prove how we humans got here without hypothesis, which includes studies as described above involving genetics. Hypothesis upon hypothesis never produces fact, only...
There you go again responding with more empty pith. Let’s examine whether you no fact from fiction since you have dug that article out and show me a single fact within it as opposed to hypothesis.
No it doesn’t and I already exposed that lie on page 2 of this thread by examining a ‘scientific’ study appearing in the magazine Nature that had been put up by the atheists. It had a multitude of flaws and sweeping statements, no fact. It is the same how you argue your case, assertion with no...
I see it just simply as knowledge. I don’t really like hypotheses, that’s just imaginative thinking also not all knowledge can be found through observing the natural world and through experimentation.
It is proof of resurrection in general and proof of the Gospel. It is interesting sects like the Pharisees believed in resurrection before it was proved by the Lord Jesus and that Muslims believe they will one day be resurrected but to date only the Lord Jesus has proved it is possible.
The whole concept of evolution relies on that very fact and is necessary.
The study of genetics does not prove evolution in anyway whatsoever. In fact it disproves evolution, genetic information carried through multiple mutations deteriorates overtime thereby disproving the idea of small...
Mice would have been running around near people for centuries. But seriously, the gestation period for mice is less than a month so worldwide experimentations on lab mice over the last 20 years should have shown something to support species to species evolution by now.
Why can you not show us some hard, non-theoretical scientific evidence, something solid like mice changing into a bigger organism instead of sounding like a stuck record.
Species to species evolution is a delusion. Your claims are not supported properly by just comparing skeletons and then speculating they just changed through adaptation, etc.
Really, to fully support your claims, you need to demonstrate a small mammal changing to another distinctly separate...
I have seen Christian families with a gay family member and can see it is a struggle with this issue. It cannot be easy for them. I would never preach to anyone who is gay, it is their life.
Re. the thread title, I’m absolutely delighted you are gay and not me. Thank you God.
Good luck with your endeavours. Btw what are Dawkins’ views on homosexuality as an evolutionary biologist? All the science papers I have read on the subject aren’t very scientific.
Christians don’t have to win debates. It‘s impossible on here anyway with sock puppet Steve Fry using every twisted atheist method available. We Christians cannot lie. You make militant atheist homosexuality look exactly like what it is, anything but not good.
If you are saying the Wikipedia synopsis of it is inaccurate you should get a sock puppet on to it.
Meme and zeitgeist are terms that don’t cut it for knowledgeable Christians.
I have had experiences of the supernatural since the God Delusion and accompanying tv documentary/marketing campaign came on the scene all those years ago. I have also since read the synopsis of it on Wikipedia. It makes no sense at all.