I have no interest in what he says. Why can’t you, a critical thinking atheist, give any facts on creation or facts in general that he has specifically seduced you enough with for you to make the comment you have instead of just putting a reverse slant on what I have told you.
Why did Sam Harris bother to introduce a hairdryer into this, what is he trying to say and mean? Does he have anything rational and logical to say. He might do something similar with a hairdryer going by that remark, only talking to Satan.
It matters a lot. Where is any of your evidence that disproves the existence of God?
I am not subjective, the evidence of the Bible is overwhelming. As many verses in the Bible state, some minds will not be able to accept the evidence of God’s existence.
Ok “Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect”- 1 Peter 3:15.
Where in that verse does it say we have the burden of proof.
And the Bible, including the account of the resurrection, has never been disproven in any court. The God Delusion on the other hand can readily be dismissed as having absolutely no credible evidence to disprove the existence of God.
You have just stated your own blind inflated view like the Pharisees. Here have a read what the Lord Jesus told them:
John 8:44-45
King James Version
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth...
I don’t know where this ‘burden of proof is on the believer’ comes from, it keeps on being peddled but it’s not biblical and simply not true. Christians are only obliged to mention the Gospel and not give proof. Any burden is on the people who don’t believe in Christ because of the consequences...
False, Satan is a real being and not a concept. Atheists even most Abrahamics don’t know this. But atheists can be oblivious to what they are actually worshiping and find out when it’s too late. There’s no excuse not believing, Romans 1.
It’s on pages 229-230 of The Blind Watchmaker. I wont quote it because of the hatred in the comment. I think you will find I’m stating fact. But why don’t you give some facts on creation from his books. It’s your opportunity to give a balanced view if you can.
In one of his books he has written his kind of evolutionary scientist “despises” scientific creationists, yet his books have no facts specifically addressing the scientific explanation on creation. You have the opportunity to state his case if you’ve read his books. He seems a man driven by hate...