So the opinions of science about evolution theory are almost set in concrete. Is it any wonder that skeptics can't see that science cannot tell us whether God was involved directly in designing and making life forms.
Oh dear, I dare to see problems in the science and that it can be wrong, and Oh dear, I see that our interpretation of the Bible has been wrong because the science over the years has been wrong.
What evidence is that?
Oh dear, now I'm being a hypocrite because I believe something instead of...
Different people either reject it or accept it as evidence for God based on whether they agree or not. I see the genetic system as evidence for God and other people say BS, and cannot see any further than the chemistry. That is like seeing a working car and rejecting that it needed a designer...
That's great. You have no idea how wonderful it is to find someone who sees me as normal, just like you, except for my little blemish, my belief in the God of the Bible and Jesus etc. I don't see any reason to believe in graviton pixies or Poseidon etc, just like you, so I don't believe in them...
The whole idea of a long molecule storing information and using it is evidence for a designer God imo. The genetic system for adaptation to environments was designed imo and in your opinion, without evidence that it was not designed, it was not designed.
How does something like that come about...
There is just a purpose that people might assign to things unless there is a purpose beyond that, the purpose they exist, as given by a creator who does things for a reason.
As I said, we all see the same things (what I call the evidence) but not all of us see it as evidence for God. It is...
It doesn't look like a baseless superstition to me. It has history and fulfilled prophecy on it's side
You want verifiable evidence for a God. What is verifiable evidence for a God in your opinion?
We do things based on our feelings a lot of the time, not on our evidence based weighing of...
Of course it all works with known mechanisms and forces etc but that is not the same as saying that it could design and build itself.
It's an argument from incredulity. Well no, it is just incredulity that it designed and made itself.
There is no answer to the question except speculation and...
One of us is completely wrong.
I believe it is you.
I believe satan exists and you do not, despite what the Bible says on the subject.
2Cor 11:13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel...
John 17: 5And now, Father, glorify Me in Your presence with the glory I had with You before the world existed.
No He did not pray that the glory God had imagined in the past would be manifested, He prayed that He would be glorified in God's presence with the glory that He had in God's presence...
I could point out more than 100 places like that where the Father (the only true God) and Son are seen as distinct.
I can also point out that the Father and Son are one and that they both are called YHWH, and that the Father and Son are always together in what they do because the Father is in...
If the intermediary between man and God is not God then He also is not a man.
True, Jesus is not His Father.
You got around to your favourite topic (Zedek) from a post that wanted to discuss the translation of John 1:1.
Nice move.
We know that God made the world/universe through His Son (Hebrews 1:2) and that in plain language this has to mean the world/universe that was made in the beginning.
Where does scripture tell us that the world that was made through the Son is the age after the resurrection and where does it...
It looks like @Trailblazer has just answered that for you.
Acts 2:14 But Peter, standing with the eleven, lifted up his voice and addressed them: “Men of Judea and all who dwell in Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and give ear to my words. 15 For these people are not drunk, as you suppose...