• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Mudramoksha

    Should condoms be handed out

    Tells a lot about you that you're so willing to guess my ethnicity, which was a very far-off assumption by the way. Non-sequitur. Well I thank you for informing me of your opinions but the rating buttons are subjective aren't they?
  2. Mudramoksha

    Blind Faith and Blind Skepticism

    The word 'faith' is as abused as the word 'skeptic'. Most people that call themselves "skeptics" are in fact not skeptics at all and are actually strict dogmatists that lie about themselves. Many people that claim to have "faith" don't even know what faith means.
  3. Mudramoksha

    The Eternal Covenant of God: Does it exist within Hinduism and Buddhism?

    Sure but the Abrahamic traditions are 'our own work' too but some (more on the fundamentalist side) get lazy instead of practice-based.
  4. Mudramoksha

    Should condoms be handed out

    Correct, they're giving examples of it. I never mentioned loving or hating sexuality, now you're putting words in my mouth. It's rather more than self evident, you must live out in the amazon jungle if you haven't seen it all around you by this point. Even if you were arguing with a...
  5. Mudramoksha

    Should condoms be handed out

    Ok, lets move on to your opening statement: Well, you just did above, not only that but you blame the calling out of sex obsession on religion rather than your own pathology. This is exactly what we should expect in a world flooded over with porn culture.
  6. Mudramoksha

    Should condoms be handed out

    My only word on the matter is that sex obsession is not healthy yet so many people seem to think that it is a good thing. Sex serves a role, relationships and marriages should be based around more valuable things. This is not even a religious opinion, it's basic nature. However, the karmic debt...
  7. Mudramoksha

    Is a Flat Tax Fair?

    I misread the thread title as something to do with Tuxedos and I thought it was gonna be fun, oh well :joycat:
  8. Mudramoksha

    Why is Islam so dangerous?

    After reading through some of your posts in this thread, I am certain that you are an apologist for terrorism. Your agenda is to defend and legitimize terrorism and demonize Islam (like Notanumber) using delusional propaganda. I have a question for you Raymann, are you an undercover Wahhabi?
  9. Mudramoksha

    The Hadith, source of Islamic atrocities.

    Then Brahman too goes bye bye. You know that I'm not talking about devas and deities. If you're truly an atheist then you've let go of Advaita and Adi Shankara forever and that's fine if you want to demote yourself from Advaita. I think Advaita Vedanta is crap myself, obviously you don't think...
  10. Mudramoksha

    The Hadith, source of Islamic atrocities.

    You mean the purpose of the movement, the kafir invention.
  11. Mudramoksha

    The Hadith, source of Islamic atrocities.

    Could you explain these verses first for me? Which verses? the first few pages are actually quite amazing, as far as scriptures go.
  12. Mudramoksha

    The Folly of Atheism

    I've only been using it in reference to the adjective, as stated in post #139, where I also specifically said that I was not referring to the Noun. This distinction, barely makes a difference between gnostic and gnosticism are related by nature - historically, semantically, etymologically...
  13. Mudramoksha

    The Folly of Atheism

    Your quoted sources here word-for-word support my correction of A Vestigial Mote's error, thank you :)
  14. Mudramoksha

    The Folly of Atheism

    A person who is a Gnostic, doesn't have to associate with any group of people or any religion. It is a knowledge that transcends religion(s), it's the point of a Gnostic. Whether someone follows a form of GnosticISM is a different topic entirely. Negative and positive atheism - Wikipedia...
  15. Mudramoksha

    The Folly of Atheism

    Nope, "Gnostic", period. No confusion. You're the one here who just uses words without knowing their meanings or history. Learn some more and then we will talk :)
  16. Mudramoksha

    The Hadith, source of Islamic atrocities.

    Why? you already know my answer is no without even asking me. Your question is just too hard, really.
  17. Mudramoksha

    The Hadith, source of Islamic atrocities.

    The extent you go in your apologetics to defend it, goes to show your favoritism. Only if it's not something you like then you glorify it, that's the way you are. Protestants :rolleyes:
  18. Mudramoksha

    The Folly of Atheism

    Then why use the term "Gnostic Atheist" when it is entirely incorrect, just use "Strong-Atheist" and call it a day. It's of spiritual experience, of the transcendent type, to be more semantically true. To be Gnostic is to actually commune with the divine, call it God or Brahman, whatever...
  19. Mudramoksha

    The Hadith, source of Islamic atrocities.

    Could you ask an irrelevant question to the wrong person?
Top