Simply read the posts of others on my original question. Study them and you make a decision as to what you believe. If you refuse to listen to them, then why even join this forum?
As we are here on a forum I don't honestly care if you don't believe Washington was the first president of the United states. I am stating my credentials and I have neither the time nor the patience to argue my life with you. If you have a point make it. Otherwise go insult someone else.
How did your teacher explain the reason for the land rising? Of course it wasn't a flood and she must have been alive to see the millions of years of land upheaval to prove her theory. Lets drop the third party quotes. How do you believe all land was once under water? Is it your "theory"...
You said, "water tends to run downhill". The word "tends" indicates that this is not a law. It does flow other ways at times. Therefore, what is your point? Oh, I get it. Your 3rd grade science teacher knows more than any scientist. If you want to continue to believe anything youa re told...
I guess my 12th grade teacher knew more than my college geology teacher? How sir did the mountains become seas over time if there was no time that the seas moved?
Most disputed his existence before the evidence was uncovered. Most of the world are not Christian and have claimed for 2000 years that the words in this collection of books are false totally. With evidence of the truth within the words people should have understood that they cannot disprove...
That is correct. From 1300 AD until archaeologists uncovered evidence, people doubted the scriptures. They believed the Hittites were just a story like Jonah and the Whale.
Once again you are totally incorrect, sir. It just had dire consequences in some societies. But many people historically disputed the bible including Darwin as a primary example.
Your first mistake is to even think of it as a possible "science book". It is ideology. Not science. But as any book, the facts within it can be proven either true or false by current evidence.
First of all science is usually not "hard" evidence. This is the very reason we call every idea of math and science a "theory". It is merely the existence of an idea yet not proven wrong. Second, nothing we know religious or scientific is based on anything that was not written down previously...
I have a BS degree and I can tell you that science does not always rely on "hard" evidence. No we call math equations theories and scientific ideas theories for a reason. They only appear in the present with our current intellect to be truth. In other words they are yet not proven to be...