A Son of God
Daniel 12:4
Give me verses that tell of things once thought wrong or just a fable that have now been shown to be truth.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Bible verses have been reinterpreted after the fact. But there are so many errors in the Bible that one really cannot claim there is any "science" in the book.Give me verses that tell of things once thought wrong or just a fable that have now been shown to be truth.
Plenty of examples from archeology. A good one is the existence of king Nebuchadnezzar which was disputed and doubted by skeptics until proven true by archeology.Give me verses that tell of things once thought wrong or just a fable that have now been shown to be truth.
Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The riverwas cut by the world's great flood andruns over rocks from the basement of time. On some of those rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.Give me verses that tell of things once thought wrong or just a fable that have now been shown to be truth.
Your first mistake is to even think of it as a possible "science book". It is ideology. Not science. But as any book, the facts within it can be proven either true or false by current evidence.Bible verses have been reinterpreted after the fact. But there are so many errors in the Bible that one really cannot claim there is any "science" in the book.
Once again you are totally incorrect, sir. It just had dire consequences in some societies. But many people historically disputed the bible including Darwin as a primary example.Disputing what the Bible says is a fairly new development in human history. To my knowledge there are no 'gotcha' verses.
A very good example sir. You are correct. that is one of many if you search you will find more.Plenty of examples from archeology. A good one is the existence of king Nebuchadnezzar which was disputed and doubted by skeptics until proven true by archeology.
What?Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The riverwas cut by the world's great flood andruns over rocks from the basement of time. On some of those rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.
Just who disputed his existence?Plenty of examples from archeology. A good one is the existence of king Nebuchadnezzar which was disputed and doubted by skeptics until proven true by archeology.
That is correct. From 1300 AD until archaeologists uncovered evidence, people doubted the scriptures. They believed the Hittites were just a story like Jonah and the Whale.The Bible mentions the Hittites. There was a time when there was no archeological evidence of the Hittites. Archeologists then were critical of the Bible for saying the Hittites existed. Later archeologists found evidence that confirmed the existence of the Hittites as described by the Bible.
Show your evidence.That is correct. From 1300 AD until archaeologists uncovered evidence, people doubted the scriptures. They believed the Hittites were just a story like Jonah and the Whale.
Most disputed his existence before the evidence was uncovered. Most of the world are not Christian and have claimed for 2000 years that the words in this collection of books are false totally. With evidence of the truth within the words people should have understood that they cannot disprove it because it is fact. Over and over it has been proven to be such. By scientific laws this makes it "hard" evidence. However, most scientists will never admit that.Who disputed his existence?
.
much of it has been proven to be false One of two minor claims, see @Shaul 's example, have been shown to be correct.Your first mistake is to even think of it as a possible "science book". It is ideology. Not science. But as any book, the facts within it can be proven either true or false by current evidence.
You want me to give examples of people who don't believe the bible? You sir are here.Show your evidence.
I have never seen that. Are you sure that you are not projecting your flaws upon others?Most disputed his existence before the evidence was uncovered. Most of the world are not Christian and have claimed for 2000 years that the words in this collection of books are false totally. With evidence of the truth within the words people should have understood that they cannot disprove it because it is fact. Over and over it has been proven to be such. By scientific laws this makes it "hard" evidence. However, most scientists will never admit that.
Not believing the Bible is not saying that all of it is wrong.You want me to give examples of people who don't believe the bible? You sir are here.
What you call a flaw I call my glory.I have never seen that. Are you sure that you are not projecting your flaws upon others?
Really?? You call your act of breaking the Ninth Commandment your glory?What you call a flaw I call my glory.