Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I think there might be more historical “evidence” than scientific.
There may be, but it is highly doubtful that it will be found in a holy book.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think there might be more historical “evidence” than scientific.
I think that the original writings of the apostles and the prophets were authentic. They existed, from a historical view but it would still be left up to spirtual interpretation as to what they experienced.There may be, but it is highly doubtful that it will be found in a holy book.
Which writings? Surely not the Gospels since they were not written by the people that they are named for.I think that the original writings of the apostles and the prophets were authentic. They existed, from a historical view but it would still be left up to spirtual interpretation as to what they experienced.
It was once thought that the sun was created before the planets of out solar system, whereas the bible stated otherwise, and that Life could not have begun to evolve on earth before the creation of the sun, as revealed in the scriptures.Give me verses that tell of things once thought wrong or just a fable that have now been shown to be truth.
It was once thought that the sun was created before the planets of out solar system, whereas the bible stated otherwise, and that Life could not have begun to evolve on earth before the creation of the sun, as revealed in the scriptures.
Newsflash, the Bible still claims that. At least it claims that the Sun and Moon were created after the Earth. Thanks for reminding us of another error in the Bible.
Another error on your part perhaps, but not an error of the bible, the sun was created after the planets of our solar system.
Darwin is included in the Bible? Well there's a turn up...But many people historically disputed the bible including Darwin as a primary example.
Dadgummit! That means I have to revise my worldview all over again! Goodbye yellow brick road.This is dumb as rocks. Stories about farm land and tornado activity in Kansas does not serve as evidence for the existence of Munchkins.
So what did they call it back then? The soon-to-be-solar system? Where do you guys get this nonsense? Its perfectly obvious that the sun was already there when the earth was created - it just hadn't been switched on yet. (And trust me - there are interpretations of day 4 that are seriously that silly)....the sun was created after the planets of our solar system
...take a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent cases of sickness.
So right on the health thing - not so hot on anatomy...and of course its not the alcohol that confers these particular health benefits is it - its the antioxidants - especially in red wine - and that is also in unfermented grape juice...so no need to consume alcohol at all (not that I'm agin' it in any way)...Moderate drinking may be linked to a lower risk of some, but not all, heart conditions a large study from England suggests.
Heck - toilets with flowing water are known from archaeological sites dating to more than a millennium or two before that was written in the Bible. In the Indus valley they had flush toilets and sewers at a site dated to about 2350 BC. Even dogs and cats bury their excrement, though admittedly they don't write stories about it. Thank dog for that!A private place should be designated for use outside the camp, and there is where you should go. A peg should be part of your equipment. When you squat outside, you should dig a hole with it and then cover your excrement".
Have you read Genesis? The Earth was created on the first day according to the myth. The Earth is a planet. On the fourth day he created the Sun and the Moon and the other planets.
Oopsy.
So what did they call it back then? The soon-to-be-solar system? Where do you guys get this nonsense? Its perfectly obvious that the sun was already there when the earth was created - it just hadn't been switched on yet. (And trust me - there are interpretations of day 4 that are seriously that silly).
Wow! This has to be one of the most tortuous attempts to twist "science" to fit scripture - I was feeling a bit mean for roundly dismissing your obviously conscientiously held views - but now that you have thrown all this into the mix, I reckon your hypothesis can take a bit more scientific prodding and probing. Overall, not a completely ridiculous effort I suppose, but the problem with it is that the earth produced vegetation on the third day - before the sun was switched on - how did that happen?A protohuman is not a human being, and nor is a protosun a sun.
Because of its great compression, the core of the condensing solar nebula, our proto-Sun finally reached about 10 million Kelvin and after the planets of the solar system had been created, the hydrogen nuclei started fusing together to produce helium nuclei and a lot of energy.
It was then that the proto-Sun "TURNED ON" and became our Sun, which produced the strong winds called T-Tauri winds named after the prototype star in the constellation Taurus.
These winds swept out the rest of the nebula that was not already incorporated into the planets. With most of the cocoon gas blown away, the new star itself becomes visible to the outside for the first time. This whole process took just a few hundred million years and was finished by about 4.6 billion years ago. At the distance of about one light year from the earth, is the great icy Dome, that is the boundary of the firmament of our heavens, in which the sun, moon, and planets of our solar system were created.
Wow! This has to be one of the most tortuous attempts to twist "science" to fit scripture - I was feeling a bit mean for roundly dismissing your obviously conscientiously held views - but now that you have thrown all this into the mix, I reckon your hypothesis can take a bit more scientific prodding and probing. Overall, not a bad effort Is suppose, but the problem with it is that the earth produced vegetation on the third day - before the sun was switched on - how did that happen?
What a load of nonsense. Don't you feel any shame for just making things up when the Bible is obviously wrong?All that the earth was created from was there in the beginning, but the earth at that time was formless, having no constant shape, and void, having no Mass.
All that the earth was at that time, was wave particles, which are not particles al all, as they have zero mass and no electric charge, yet they carry angular and linear momentum.
The sun was created on the fourth period of universal activity or the fourth creative day, but the earth was created on the third day, when God divided the solar nebula cloud from the galactic nebula cloud and the planets were created.
Boy! You don't give up do you. The Bible simply doesn't say that the planets were created before the sun anyway. But the extremophile thing is just a joke - the Bible has fruit trees growing on the third day - according to your timetable thats at least 4 billion years before plants evolved.First of all, you have not conceded that the bible is correct in stating that the planets were created before our sun.
As to life beginning to evolve in the steaming hot waters of the primitive earth before the creation of the sun, Look to the life that has evolved over 6 miles beneath the ocean around the extremely hot vents, where sunlight cannot and does not penetrate.
The bible is correct my friend and you know it.What a load of nonsense. Don't you feel any shame for just making things up when the Bible is obviously wrong?
Boy! You don't give up do you. The Bible simply doesn't say that the planets were created before the sun anyway. But the extremophile thing is just a joke - the Bible has fruit trees growing on the third day - according to your timetable thats at least 4 billion years before plants evolved.