I have addresses this a number of times. Do you understand n the point about there being no 'correct' definition of 'atheism'? I do not think babies have philosophical views.
Wow! You still don't get it. No mate, defeating a definition is a waste of time - you misunderstand how language works...
Well until you ask a few more questions, somebody telling you that they are an atheist doesn't really tell you anything. So my answer is: Nothing, absolutely nothing.
No position on what George? You keep leaving out all of the details needed to make what you are saying legible.
What error? You are only giving me fragments again.
Who is doing that?
How so? Where is the argument for this?
What evidence? For what position?
What evidence? For what God? Your...
Well you seem certain of that. I am not. It is a pretty big claim.
"Any being objectively existing would have some degree of control over the universe"? I don't really know how you could prove such a claim, or why it would matter.
Just a reality check mate, but you have swung in here making a fuss about how dumb you think I am - but your entire argument against me has been nothing more than calling me names and misreading. Sure, you may think my arguments are poor, but at least I have them. Better my poor arguments than...
Great. Yes, the deist conceptions of god, along with many others I listed do not fit your description of God. They are not claimed to have control over the universe.