• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    But can you tell the difference between Darwin’s molecules to man theory and the allele frequency in population genetics? This is where you guys lost me because between these two theories is a huge increase in genetic information. Can you account where that new genetic information, between...
  2. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    So, from Darwin’s molecules to man theory to allele frequency in population genetics is what you’re saying here, right?
  3. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Before we continue our debate, so that we could avoid misunderstanding and accuse me of twisting your words again, can you explain the difference between macroevolution and microevolution from your own understanding, i.e., on how you summarized it from any reading materials or articles like...
  4. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    I wish you could summarize this for me.
  5. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    You can find fossils, no argument there, but transitional forms from fish to amphibian to reptile to mammal is what you can’t account for, and that is, macroevolution. Until you find the intermediate links between amphibians evolving into reptiles, then you can’t argue that macroevolution is...
  6. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Explain the modern theory of evolution.
  7. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Intermediate links between an ancestral form and that of its descendants are referred to as transitional forms. Read it again. “If Darwin’s theory of natural selection were true, paleontologists studying fossils should be able to find intermediate links between existing species and their parent...
  8. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    So we could avoid misunderstanding in the future; tell me Darwin’s view of evolution; Was it from inorganic to organic to fish to amphibian to reptile to mammal?
  9. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    How can you support macroevolution when you can’t even find the missing links or “transitional forms” to support this baseless theory. Darwin said, “Why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?” So, the assumption is, we should find “transitional forms” in...
  10. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    I thought I was doing that… It’s easier to concentrate that way. There is theory and scientific theory and there is gossip. I’ll take the theory over gossip but prefer the scientific theory.
  11. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Bait and switch And what is that one progenitor for all life forms that was based on Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species?
  12. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Are you sure about that? Several types ofE. coliexist as part of the normal flora of the human gut and have many beneficial functions, such as the production ofvitaminK2. They also prevent harmful bacteria, known as pathogenic bacteria, from establishing themselves in the intestine.
  13. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    We are talking about E.coli eating glucose and citrate as food and human as regular food and lactose. You can’t feed E.coli and human with rocks and rocks is never categorized as food to both. One could eat organic soil to cure crohn’s disease but never rocks.
  14. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    They can’t find any genetic basis for the change so there is NO NEW GENETIC INFORMATION. It was just an enlargement of muscles in the valve between small and large intestine that was already there. The same thing as the E.coli feeding on glucose in an aerobic environment but after consuming all...
  15. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    You should point your commentary to the person who introduced the Hardy-Weinberg Law. All I was saying is, Dr. Lee Spetner in more knowledgeable than any of these guys as far as studying mutation at the molecular level.
  16. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    No, not really. In an isolated system entropy goes into equilibrium meaning; no energy entering or leaving the system, no chaos, no disorder, no friction, no entropy or IOW, THE END OF EVERYTHING. Earth is not in an isolated system. The energy from the sun gives life and at the same time it...
  17. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Farmers? What farmers are you talking about?
  18. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Bait and switch or are you confused again. When you talk about Darwin’s evolution you are talking about abiogenesis and macroevolution and not microevolution.
  19. JM2C

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Based on ideology and not on scientific theory.
Top