You know what your problem is? You probably never met a person who never cursed at all.
READ AND UNDERSTAND: I only used that to stop him from cursing me? WHY CAN’T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT?
I should stop because they stop, right? How about pushing it a little bit more so they could understand on how...
No I’m asking you.
I’m not apologizing to anyone. I apologized to you when I misread your statement because I was wrong.
You are right they are not the same that’s why I would rather use that instead of cursing.. You have no rights to curse others because they don’t agree with you.
I only use...
So, you would rather curse others to make a point. What if I don’t curse and just want to make a point by using those words just to stop them from cursing, can you see the difference now? Why can’t you see my side? I don’t like to curse.
Where does it end, the cursing?
I wrote this to shad,
“We are here to debate and not insult each other. If I’m wrong correct me, but that doesn’t mean you are right when you’re correcting me. We could trade insults all day long, but at the end of the day we can ask ourselves, did I learn...
Of course you would say that. I would not argue with that.
show me where?
Meaning when they stop cursing or using nasty words then I should stop until they start again and that’s the only time I could start again. It that what you meant?
What a way to escape from an argument. Not related to the census? Really? We were never in anyway close to the OP’s so why complain now? You get into an argument with no full understanding of what or why you are getting into it and then start complaining when things get complicated, on things...
Let see how far your ignorance can take you.
“she is with child” or “BE WITH CHILD” in Matthew 1:23 is “en gastri hexei” in Greek meaning “in womb will hold”. We didn’t SEE the word “CHILD/PAIDION”, did we?
MT 1:23 “BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD AND SHALL BEAR A SON, AND THEY SHALL...
You’re argument now is the age. Really?
Why would Herod search “male children who were in Bethlehem and all its vicinity,from two years old and under”?
What is the “AND UNDER”? A baby in the manger? NO! A CHILD/PAIDION!
Herod was looking for a CHILD/PAIDION, "2 YEARS AND UNDER". DO YOU...
READ AND UNDERSTAND THIS:
In Luke’s account, it’s the SHEPHERDS WHO FOUND THE BABY/BREPHOS IN THE MANGER.
In Matthew’s account, it’s the Magi who saw the CHILD/PAIDION IN THE HOUSE.
IOW, two different occasions, i.e., one is with a baby in Luke’s, and the other one is with a child in...
IOW, if it’s about your genealogical record the china man’s statement does not apply to it. Read again china man’s statement.
but look at how irate this china man is
NO china man you made a mistake when you said this “genealogical history are unreliable” and therefore blame it on me, like...
We came here to debate and we can do this without using unpleasant words. If you start something, like using nasty words, then, please DO NOT CRY LIKE A CHILD AND HIT THE "REPORT" BUTTON ON THE LEFT.
Is that how you argue. This is not a matter of opinion. Opinion generates nothing but ignorance and you AND THE OTHER GUY are full of it. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, GENIUS?
What historical records are you talking about? You can’t even explain those two verses without falling apart and you got the nerve to say that you knew something about historical records. You blame your failure on me, that’s what you’ve been doing so far. You’re questioning my education while...
and this is how you correct others who don’t agree with you, GENIUS? Let’s not start crying now. What did I tell you? You can correct me without insulting me.