• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. David M

    Evolutionists, where, geographically, did man evolve?

    In that case I think the term should be "realist".
  2. David M

    Any flat earthers here?

    Firstly they did not exist at the same time. Secondly there has always been a population of humans, never one female or one male. Go read those wiki entries and try to understand them. So lets make it clear, most recent common ancestor in no way whatsoever means "only member of the species...
  3. David M

    Any flat earthers here?

    Why would they not use rwd which denotes a sphere in terms of shape (Isiah 22:18). There was a word that could have been used that far, far more accurately describes the shape of the earth but they went with one that meant circle.
  4. David M

    Any flat earthers here?

    But if you are writing a description you use "oblate spheroid".
  5. David M

    Any flat earthers here?

    No it hasn't. Science absolutely refutes the idea that here was ever that few humans alive. Been on a plane and on some mountains, no it does not look flat. Been the other side of the world to someone and my day was their night which shows its not flat.
  6. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    No,. It was Austin's published results that stated he submitted whole rock samples. Which makes any claim that the sample cause any issues for K/Ar dating a dishonest claim.
  7. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    A lie, one of so many that you repeat without fact checking them. That picture was drawn by an artist and published in a magazine. No scientist was involved in the process at all. In fact AT THE TIME the scientist who misidentified the tooth stated that the picture had no scientific relevance:
  8. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    No. As you were repeatedly shown Austin's Mt St Helen's results were fraudulent.
  9. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    There was a reason those sentences were in quotes. But you do have a history of being unable to work out context. Still waiting for you to admit that I never claimed and relation to royal blood in my genealogy related posts.
  10. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    No, Cursing is not a personal attack per se. Insulting a person is a personal attack whether it contains cursing or not. As examples the following are perfectly within the forum rules because they are not aimed at a forum member even though they might contain "cursing": That is the F**king...
  11. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Ignorant, arrogant and racist. Its a creatonist trifecta. This time I was the one who hit the report button, not the person you used racist language against, so don't try accusing him of anything.
  12. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    You are the one who mixed my statement up with his, you are the one who accused me of wanting to be linked to royal blood. Going to admit you were wrong? He made no mistake, he was talking about genealogies that go back a very long time. In fact he referenced the biblical genealogies in one...
  13. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    That statement does not mean that they cannot be relied upon where good written records exist. The Bible is not a good written record by the way. The Genealogy of my family can be traced back about 500 years reliably for direct ancestors with the family surname because reliable records exist in...
  14. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    But that is exactly what your theology does. Creationists/Literalists make God and the Bible liars because so many of the claims that are held as being wholly factual are flat out contradicted by the evidence from reality, that makes God and the Bible purposely deceptive.
  15. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    So he just provided more proof that he is incapable of following a written conversation properly as he can't distinguish between 2 poster on this board.
  16. David M

    Evolutionists, where, geographically, did man evolve?

    No, there isn't enough. All humans are members of a single species.
  17. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Which should mean their city of residence, which was the way that a Roman census was carried out.
  18. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Where did I pretend I belong to royal blood. I challenge you to substantiate your dishonest claim or retract it. If you do neither you will just make yourself look even more foolish. My post about genealogy was: Where is any mention of a "master race" in there. Unless you are proposing that...
  19. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    Linnaeus was Swedish. He is the father of modern Taxonomy. Its roots go back to the ancient Greeks and Egyptians. As to why its used... because it works.
  20. David M

    Harsh Truth: If Intelligent Design is Untestable . . .

    There is life found in rock layers deep, deep underground.
Top