this suggests there is evil intent. As I was saying here, the plain translation of the word עלמה in Isaiah 7:14 is not a virgin but "the young woman". so, understandably the rabbis interpret the prophecy (that was told 700 years earlier and a context that makes you rethink whether it talks about...
you said:
I assume you said it under the assumption that he wasn't the Messiah. So, Christ wanted to be the Messiah and eventually, God made him the Messiah. Christianity says he always was the Messiah.. since he was God's son.
Yes. And I think the point is which Jews? the peasant or scholars? I think the peasant that if they didn't follow Christ, they would idol worship. in a smaller scale, though.
I agree. but it doesn't mean that the boy is his son. moreover, if Christ is the son of God, then he is not the descendent of King David, which is a requirement to be the Messiah..
the Jewish people have never believed in Christ. He may have misled people to believe in him, but it says nothing.
in the video, the possibility to make a sin is the issue. in Judaism, there are 620 commandments, and not committing them may be a sin in different levels. the sin that he talks...
it wasn't the point that I made, but sure. It is quite ridiculous to say that Crist was the messiah when the idea is that he bring an undeniable change to the world, among them the end of death and especially wars. Now that I think about it I see what the Romans saw in this cult. They saw a...
How important are the 5-10% of the textual variances in the NT? Some of them are giants! Here are a few examples:
1) Is the doctrine of the Trinity found in 1 John 5:7-8? It depends on which manuscript you read.
2) Did Jesus appear to any of his followers after the resurrection in the book...
I find that hard to believe that the Greek translation translated העלמה as a virgin. the original Septuagint was forced upon the rabbis and was over the first 5 books - Genesis to Deuteronomy. Rabbis very disliked translating the Tanach in general and specifically the Tora. so, it is safe to...
if I understood you correctly, you're saying that phrase 19 and phrase 20 are two separated phrases with no connection between them, correct?
who can you call here to be an external commenter?
I didn't understand the issue with Adam.