Why, yes. But it is only necessary to a limited extent. As it misleads the experimenter into believing that the tautology "reality exists" does not go beyond the merely ephemeral, materialistic dimension. That is where logic fills in the gaps. A thing that is real is subject to logical proof...
Granted modern science is ill-equipped to answer questions of a metaphysical bent. However, this is due to the lack in logic that mankind has not been granted thus far. You simply demote logic to faith because you lack the fundamentals. I see farther, though I imagine you are not satisfied with...
Unfortunately, much of today's world does not see it that way. It is high time that God be put to rest on something more than faith. Namely, logic.
So you reject the logical version of God based merely on a whimsical feeling? The two (science and religion) are compatible to say the least. They...
Your suspicion is noted. But it is not based on logic, the supreme authority of what is real and what is not. Logic is the sole reason that science and religion both share the same reality.
In the absolute truth of this author's mind, reality takes the form of an SCSPL (Self-Configuring...
Causal inference is interactive and linear; events are predicted from prior events occurring along timelines. Formal inference is derivational; specific relationships are substituted for more general ones (or vice versa) irrespective of temporal priority. A supertautology evolves self-dually or...
Metareligion as Human Singularity:
Causal inference is interactive and linear; events are predicted from prior events occurring along timelines. Formal inference is derivational; specific relationships are substituted for more general ones (or vice versa)...
Suppose you have a moving body at time t. Then it's position would be a function f that contains a domain representing time at t. Therefore, if one wishes to find the position, they would simply calculate the function f(t). Whereas at time t=3, the body is at f(3), and at t=2, the body is at...
Atheism is a failed attempt at reaching a logical conclusion on the existence of God (however one defines that).
My philosophical musings have lead me to the conclusion that God is real. They have been backed by the "smartest man in America", Christopher Langan. I even contributed to three of...
Yes. Reality is a language of languages, a powerful one at that. It thus implies a syntax all its own. Any attempt to perceive reality would suggest that syntax inheres in reality. Otherwise it would result in a world of false objects (see my post titled: God reveals Himself to anyone at any...
It ranges from the physical to the spiritual, with a virtually non-existent barrier between the two in a higher dimensional reality. I previously interpreted your response as an attempt to cast doubt on my near axiomatic definition of "nature".
There is no denying that we have a subjective nature. It is often in dispute about which is real - objective or subjective? But this distinction is in actuality illusory which has lead to a great deal of conflict in the sciences and philosophical discussions. The mind-matter dualism for example...
I read on Wikipedia that vision relies on the quantum mechanical conversion of light signals into action potentials in a process called phototransduction. Where the eye's photoreceptors then absorbs the light signals.
Then I read that conscious awareness in the ORCH OR theory starts with the...
I assumed you were intentionally misleading the public. But rather concluded that you're simply ignorant.
Then I'm afraid your logic has fallen short of reality. Which leads me to ask, why do you contradict yourself by stating that logic (and God) is imaginary yet you state here that it leads...
Forgive me for jumping to conclusions. Your false deduction lead me to conclude that your pretence about mathematics was maliciousness masquerading as innocence.
You're an atheist I presume. That makes you wrong at the outset of this discussion. As you are making a poor attempt to mislead the...
Mathematicians like Aristotle and the 16th century movement of the age of reason gave us the imaginary number, i. This concept of an imaginary number extended our numerical horizon.
This is a false conclusion meant to distract the public from the fact that mathematics and reality share the same reality and therefore mathematics equals reality. But in mental form. As a language of mind, which is then expressed in reality.
I see through your poor attempt to misdirect the...