To anyone reading who has any questions about anything I have written, or wishes to pursue a healthy and informed conversation regarding these topics, please let me know. Constantly pointing out one person's ignorance and errors gets boring. If that person wishes to continue spouting untruths...
oh, so admiring anything is idolatry? LOL.
You wrote "idolatry, in Judaism and Christianity, the worship of someone or something other than God as though it were God. "
or did you forget that YOU wrote that.
there is a whole lot to cover so I might just find good resources and not try to reinvent the wheel.
Judaism sees the site of the temple mount as a locus of spirituality. It is the site from which the world was created, the site of the binding of Isaac and the site of the holy of holies in the...
Facts don't look for popularity.
Actually, England allowed the people in the region to set up governments. Israel did. Arabs didn't. Are you going to keep guessing dumb things?
Nothing like me. For example, I'm educated.
No, that isn't actually true. But because you know nothing of Judaism...
Zion is a whole lot more than that.
No, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. The UN voted to recognize Israel. It didn't create Israel. You need to learn history.
You just prefer to speak from ignorance. Got it.
Note that it says "fears of violence" and the article doesn't substantiate any...
that doesn't change anything. There are many instances of the phrase but that doesn't change the meaning of the term.
Jeruslaem is Israel, in fact it is the capital of Israel and it allows the waqf to manage certain sites
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jerusalem-islamic-waqf
Wow, you...
You must have forgotten that you wrote " the actual term is about zion (the fortress/the mount)" But the actual term isn't. While the word is used to refer to a variety of objects and places, that doesn't make every one of those things what the term zionism is about.
we have plans and...
No, the actual term is about the concept of Tziyon (transliterated into "Zion") but that isn't a fortress or a mount. If you are talking about the temple mount, Israel handed control of it over to the waqf a long time ago.
for the concept of Zionism, it isn't as much about the capital as it is about the actual name of the movement because there are so many kinds of Zionism. Modern, political Zionism might be said to have a lesser connection to Judaism (not none, though) but certain types of Zionism are synonymous...
No, I'm saying that an answer of "it depends on context" is useless because that's a truth about all communication. In this case, the context that the presidents indicated might exist is that calling for genocide could be acceptable. While the words might be context dependent, there are limits...
I really wish you had read the rest of what I posted (to wit, "So saying "depends on context" is fine, but deciding that that context can allow sincere mass calls for violence is wrong. "). The problem I was commenting on was that "depends on context" is a valueless answer because it is...
It isn't about "calling for genocide" it is about the use of the phrase. If I am at a conference and we are discussing political slogans, and I show a video in which people are demonstrating, using that phrase, the context, as an academic discussion, makes the iteration of the words less...
I am most annoyed that the presidents answered "it depends on context" but not because I think that that is wrong. I know it is right -- everything we say acquires meaning based on context, so "duh" of course it depends on context. If I am using it as dialogue in a short story, that's one thing...