You have completely missed the boat now. You made a statement. I quoted you. In post 527, you wrote
--
--"Human Sheild" argument does justify the killing of civilians by Hamas ..--
that's what you wrote. You put quotes around "Human Shield" nothing else, so you aren't quoting anyone else...
Really? Show me.
Ah, so you DO believe in multiple Gods.
is that a question?
That Israel (in your words, "The desire of Likhud to punish the "Dirty Arabs" ... and what the Bibi and Likhud have been doing for decades. It is not like this is the first incident of Ethnic Cleansing.") is trying...
Then you should reread what you wrote -- ""Human Sheild" argument does justify the killing of civilians by Hamas"
and now you say it doesn't justify the war crimes OF Hamas. I never said it did. I don't think Hamas's war crimes can be justified.
Have you protested against that or said that...
"primary divinity"? What does that even mean? Is there a secondary divinity and you are a polytheist? I guess so.
That you are parroting a particular historical theory is a rejection of divinity. That you don't understand that is sad. And the Amalekites weren't in "the land". But you probably...
He was refering to the requirement not to forget what evil did against you and imploring everyone not to forget what Hamas did. That's what he says. You can decide he means something else, but when America says "Remember the Alamo" or "remember the Maine" in the context of a current crisis it...
You are quoting history and science because you reject the primacy and divinity of the text. That's fine, but it has nothing to do with Judaism (or ancient Israel). Of course, the historical discussion of whether one culture imported a god figure from another has nothing to do with anything...
He specifically quoted one part and you think he meant another part. That's on you.
well, to your mind, I guess.
So take the biblical Israelites to the ICC.
No they aren't. See, because you don't care about facts, and you want to make the connections you like, you ignore facts.
So now you...
Prove it. I say he did.
It can't -- it would turn you into an authority and you aren't one.
So now you tell me what I care about and don't care about.
No, I don't see you as capable. I'm not sure you are a people.
You really need a class in English because what you are writing makes no sense...
Post 474, you wrote " i offered evidence to the contrary"
That's not a query that's a claim of proof.
So your statement "NONE are chosen to be good by even rabbi or any god. The good choose to keep the rules.." is worthless
I quote you directly but you don't keep track of what you say.
the difference is, I never claimed to have any evidence. You did.
in post 470 you wrote, "The whole universe is by god, just not in the model that you use." I quoted you in 472. Why do you claim that that's not true?
lack of acceptance of your opinion. You aren't an authority.
none of this...
"evidence"? No, not really. Just your insistence that "NOT EVEN A SINGLE WORD" was written by God. That's not evidence. That's petulance.
by quoting you directly?
show me how my claim to being an authority about Judaism is a mistake.
No, you quoted a line which said the opposite -- "Rabbinic tradition's understanding is that all of the teachings found in the Torah (both written and oral) were given by their God through the prophet Moses". How does that provide any information saying that my claim to the divinity of the text...
that would be communal responsibility.
You claimed that something made sense. That puts you in the center of deciding what makes sense.
So you ignore the ones YOU think are bad. Again, that puts you at the center.
So YOU believe
Who says I'm not?
So the text which calls them commandments is...
Yes, I do. The Torah. Just like what you quoted.
and your "succinct" response is your belief that nothing is from God.
Except I showed your mistake and you have done nothing but make empty claims.
Actually, I am an authority because I have been learning from earlier authorities. Sort fo the...
but I'm not divine and "honesty" isn't the determinant of divinity.
You denied there is anything divine. Now you are saying you believe in God?
I'm glad you see that! When you learn English, let me know.
You still haven't explained what that means to you or why you think it drives the...
No, you think this but since it isn't what was quoted nor what it means, you are wrong.
the "we" isn't about what "we" say the text, itself, is saying but what you think it means when referenced.
Your assumption of meaning and excluding context and yet claiming that "we" all know what you...
You mean you didn't go back to the post I listed and looked to see? Because that's where tha question is.
I didn't say you did. You need to be more careful in your reading.
God is referred to by a series of titles.
it's nice that you think this but you are wrong. If only you had reread that...