How so? I specifically asked you to explain your assertion.
Otherwise, you're presenting a false dichotomy.
I might as well ask if you've stopped crapping your pants. Or beating your wife.
Loaded questions with false premises will get you nowhere...except further proving my case.
Who said its limited? As opposed to not having a form at all? What if they can shape-shift? What if they just like the human form?
I still don't get why it doesn't make sense to you. What makes you think its a "Random ape species" and not a specifically designed form? In our Theology, it...
For self-glory? Maybe he likes having a human form.
So what's the difference other than they have psychological flaws? Perhaps he's just a perfectly enlightened version of the same type?
Because He made them. Why he made them is an age-long philosophical question.
Not necessarily...