Thanks for confirming, by noting the basic assumptions.
Now, the many links you may read from, research from will give you sound science and then the unanswered questions will give you, "such and such are "THOUGHT" to have ........" "Such and such "COULD HAVE." Therein enters the opinion...
I know that many not dare go against the status quo of the scientific church community, but for those free in mind and free from conforming to anything... these are some decent ideas:
Top Ten Scientific Flaws In The Theory of Prehistoric Dinosaurs
"The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either coordinate system could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, 'the sun is at rest and the earth moves,' or 'the sun moves and the earth is at...
I have yet to discover science doing anything, what I do discover is human intelligence/morale performing the work. All are products of human intelligence. Or am I missing your assertion that science itself is a living entity somewhere?
As for the rest, I am not sure what you're imagining was...
There is no evidence that the Earth orbits the Sun. It is just as plausible to conclude that the Sun and stars orbits the Earth. Even Einstein was honest enough to admit this. A lot of people still lack the honesty and ability to know themselves. Both are taken by faith/confidence. I know...
I perceive that many are offended by confidence or trust in something, and unaware of themselves and their own confidence and trust in things. . become defensive when the the confidence/trust is revealed amongst their beloved models in mind. Perhaps it's due to emotion and distaste for religions...
I have faith that human intelligence, knowledge, knowing, awareness will expand and we will come to know the truth of our inner nature and external nature more with time. Do you not?
That is too easy, all of the mythological creatures that are missing in a left to right linear timeline. Now, you either have faith/confidence that they exist or they don't exist. Which is it? An issue is claiming them as fact with no evidence. It's also an issue to admit that it's by...
However may I please your need for excitement? If I said that people that believe in anything other than you do are stupid, know no truth, are inferior, point fingers and blame others... will this satisfy you? Do I have to laugh at, mock, condescend upon others to fulfill your needs?
More fruitful finger pointing and blaming.
Of course, Mestemia, how dare I question your truth knowing abilities, and however could I even doubt you could be wrong. Shame on me.
Perhaps you can tell me all about the truth of Nature, the universe since you may have righteous judgement, all-knowing capability.
No worries for you, I don't think of myself or my models concocted in my mind as more or less superior.
Put your righteous judgements upon me in fruitful...
You don't have to respond if you're that bored.
Well great, you are all knowing of me, gave fruitful responses to the things you have questions about rather than picking a few quotes and making your righteous judgements on another rather than the concepts you have questions regarding.
Sure, whatever you unconsciously translate whatever you read to be within your sound, perfect, righteously judged makeup.
Thanks for your opinion. Pointing fingers and blaming has been a great tool and benefit to the human race.
Talk is pretty cheap. Sounds like an empty assertion from you.
Elaborate on how scientists don't intelligently design and create their models.
Elaborate on Nature's determining factor as to which model is more superior. Are you all-knowing?
Elaborate on, as far back as you can go, how the...
Agree that a lot of it is a solid method to obtain knowledge of our observed and measurable environment.
Disagree on Jose Fly's comment, using humans who intelligently designed/created models yet ripping on intelligent design/creation. Whereas, as far back as this universe is observed...
So you give one example of something not based on opinion/assumption and correlate the rest not being based on opinion/assumption. Whereas if you were being honest, it's not difficult to find any of the uber amounts of it that are based on opinion/assumptions/guesses/could's/"thought to have's."