From being gay to not being gay, obviously. Could you change from being straight to being gay? Only I could not, and the sheer pernicious arrogance of asking others to is sickening.
Nope, but it still doesn't surprise me you don't understand the difference. I'd be minded to help edify you, but your posts long ago suggested a mind so closed as to make it a futile effort.
You may find it helpful to define free will, as you seem to be making contradictory claims. Al's the word prove, as one wonders what your basing belief on, what for example if your criteria for accepting something as true, or conversely for disbelieving it?
It's also a rather dishonest straw man, since no one has ever suggested same sex couples can reproduce together. Only refuted the absurd claim that gay people can't or don't reproduce, and even in precisely the way their religion risibly claims everyone should, by have intercourse primarily for...
If you want uncritical approbation, then espousing religious absolutes that involve hate speech like homophobia to an atheist and humanist, is hardly likely to succeed, now is it?
I haven't called anyone stupid, and the prejudice that has been pointed out is irrefutable, even without those...
Because you quoted his post as a preface, obviously. What a truly bizarre question.
Though this does explain the penchant for irrelevant straw men fallacies.
Or protecting us, depending on your viewpoint, but yes science is simply a method for understanding reality. It can of course help make informed choices about what we deem moral, and why.
Uncritically following doctrine, is simply indoctrination, it is in no way morality, which by definition...
Science is a toolbox, a collection of methods we use to examine and understand reality. The process can help us make informed decisions about what we (subjectively) deem to be moral and why.
Religions are just a collection of often errant and archaic doctrine and dogma. Telling someone they...
Nope, that's just a subjective opinion, other humans have the right to measure your claims against science, logic and even their own subjective morality, when that is manifestly less pernicious.