• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. D

    Why Evolution Is Wrong In Biology And What is Right?

    I know you'd like me to answer "intelligence." But i'm going to answer "butts" instead. You do it with butts.
  2. D

    Why Evolution Is Wrong In Biology And What is Right?

    I believe that you believe that you're doing what you claim here. But i don't believe that evolution has been falsified. And having read your... Paper in the OP, i know that you haven't falsified it. Maybe, if we found someone more intelligent than you to falsify it, maybe they could do it. But...
  3. D

    How would we know if a species was newly evolved?

    Proof for what? You admitted to trying to understand evolution, and that you still don't. Now if only you could admit that it might be a limit of your understanding rather than a problem for the theory, this could finally be going somewhere, but as it stands, we're still at only this point in...
  4. D

    Why Evolution Is Wrong In Biology And What is Right?

    The real question is: What are you doing here?
  5. D

    Why Evolution Is Wrong In Biology And What is Right?

    I'm gonna answer 2. Now: If you can't answer the following, I will question your ability in general: What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
  6. D

    How would we know if a species was newly evolved?

    So, long story short: You tried to understand evolution. It didn't work. And now we're here arguing your straw men. Ugh.
  7. D

    No Formula

    No you didn't. You thought about doing it. Then attempted it. And then failed spectacularly at it.
  8. D

    Universal human rights: nonsense on stilts.

    Express yourself more clearly. I got the same idea as the other poster.
  9. D

    Are Adam and Eve Incompatible with Evolution?

    By reading your posts I'm fully convinced that this is either a hilarious joke or incredible lack of self-awareness. I.E the image I get is a useless, skilless person trying to prop up their non-existent abilities.
  10. D

    Critique of falsification criteria of Popper

    Yes it does. You just don't understand how the world operates.
  11. D

    Christianity v. Secular Humanism

    That's what you claim but fail to justify. So far it only seems moral to those who consider slavery moral but murder immoral. Others will see that as an inconsistency. I see it as evidence of the fact that the bible is not objectively moral. I disagree with you therefore one of us is wrong...
  12. D

    Christianity v. Secular Humanism

    Sometimes it's also "right" to deprive a person of a snake biting their leg. Your analogy and/or understanding is poor: The point was that it's wrong to deprive someone of anything without their consent. As the depriver, you are not the arbiter of moral justice. Slavery is "only" wrong in the...
  13. D

    Christianity v. Secular Humanism

    It's not an ad hominem to refuse to read an author's work before pronouncing him a liar. You should probably learn to understand what logical fallacies are before attempting to use them. But just to help him out a bit. Your source makes the claim that slavery has historically been mostly...
  14. D

    Christianity v. Secular Humanism

    Your "morality" is based on asking the slaveholder what's appropriate for the treatment of the slave(the Bible.) Our morality is based on asking the slave whatever they think about being enslaved(humanism.) Since the slaves themselves will universally say "slavery is wrong" I'm going to take...
  15. D

    Christianity v. Secular Humanism

    If this was a boxing match, then BilliardsBall lost before he started thinking of getting boxing lessons. I don't understand his inconsistency: Every time he posts something it makes atheists and secular humanists look really, really, really good.
  16. D

    Christianity v. Secular Humanism

    That just means secularists are more consistent and convincing than you. That just means that you are morally bankrupt and inconsistent. And that the bible is morally bankrupt and inconsistent. I can find several reasons why you would subjugate others, but none of those are moral. I think...
  17. D

    Fine Tuning argument / The best argument for the existence of God

    Thanks. Now i must make a decision whether or not i want to spend all that time reading such a long article just to argue it later with a guy who's denying the existence of gravity, even though this paper is contingent on gravity existing in the first place. I might or i might not read it, and...
  18. D

    Fine Tuning argument / The best argument for the existence of God

    I can only access the abstract which means I can't comment much about it. I don't think you can either.
  19. D

    Fine Tuning argument / The best argument for the existence of God

    I don't know of any scientist trying to explain the FT in any way because it's a creationist argument. This is just your incredulity: You cannot imagine an alternative to that so you won't. No matter what. But we're supposed to imagine your chosen alternative like BAM. Once more: There is no FT...
  20. D

    Fine Tuning argument / The best argument for the existence of God

    This thread is just pigeon chess. Nothing more.
Top