This makes no sense. None. It is Agenticity at its finest; a conscious, intentional attempt to attribute human qualities to a non-human object. It's utter dribble. Sorry to be harsh, but I struggle to find a gentler way to express myself.
This does not follow. Why would science, as a woman, be...
Or it proves the primal nature which exists in all human beings; that primal nature being evidence of evolution.
"Pagan" covers a very wide and disparate religions that cover a wide range of human behavior, some of them being barbaric. The Christian religion is equally guilty of barbarism, of...
I mentioned above the "Law of Identity".
One of the three laws of Logic.
Yes, it is impossible to have an entity that changes and does not change. This is why it is important that we know, understand, assign characteristics in defining the "identity" of a given "object". There is no rule in...
The definition of Person is "Human Being". I am, and always will be, "Human Being". I will always be THIS "Human Being". This is known as the "Law of Identity"; one of the "Laws of Logic". The definition of "Body" is "Physical structure of a person". I am a person, thus i must have a physical...
Ooops, tricked again. I honestly thought that the OP was a genuine question from someone who honestly wanted to know an atheist's perspective on a given topic. Turns out it's a bait question to engage in debate against an atheist because you've already made your mind up what an atheist thinks.
Yes; a "typical" flood; but that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about a worldwide flood that was, according to the Creationist, able to carve out the Grand Canyon in minutes; yet magically, with all that torrent going on, wouldn't mix up what was on the ground.
These...
Hi eddi. I left the faith after my entire teenage years being immersed in it. I do deeply empathize with your transition. It is a heck of a thing to believe that you rest in the palm of the hand of an omnipotent being. It left me feeling empty, confused, and unsure of a great many things, like...
NOW we're getting somewhere. I have to run off to work for night shift, but I have every intention of responding to your post. You show some compassion, but you also show fear; which is understandable and also admirable, as it shows that you care for the protection of those who can't protect...
Radiometric dating is an exact science It does not provide precise results, but instead provides ranges and probable dates; which is why multiple methods of dating any sample are used.
There aren't "assumptions" in radiometric dating We know how many isotopes are supposed to be present in a...
Uh, atheist here, and, uh, no. Silly that I would be asked to intellectualize such an event; but here goes:
I can see the woman. I can see that she is real.
Because she is real and she is a woman, it stands to reason that she can provide me carnal pleasure.
She appears willing and consensual in...
It matters a great deal. The answer to this question has significant implications in how they are treated; by the law, by society, by the mental health community. It matters a great deal.
No one said otherwise and these statements are givens.
As well they should not be. Another given.
If...
No, you would tell us what Christian apologists tell you what the flaws supposedly are and regurgitate misinformation. Christian apologists, like Ken Ham and Kent Hovind, are not scientists.
Cripes, you guys think scientists are so stupid. That is utterly laughable and worthy of ridicule.
This does not even compute. I can't even take it in. Eons separate the fossil layers. Not minutes or hours or days. We have dating methods. We have DNA decoding. Out of one side of their mouths, the Creationist tells us that we can't "trust" the fossil record because <insert claim>. But now we...
Science has yet to agree on a concrete term of "consciousness". Science depends on precise definitions. You can't prove or disprove something until it is precisely defined and its characteristics, as well, are precisely defined.
Consciousness - Wikipedia.
So its not that science has "failed...
oops! Bumbed <enter> before I completed, so let's try again:
I am a mathematical idiot, diagnosed as "learning disabled in the manipulation of numbers". What I can say, in spite of the intelligent-seeming math (which has been noted by others who evidently can do math, that it also "fails") is...
I am a mathematical idiot, diagnosed as "learning disabled in the manipulation of numbers". What I can say, in spite of the intelligent-seeming math (which has been noted by others who evidently can do math, that it also "fails") is just a couple points of logic in the OP
I just caught this.
Narcissism is a complex personality disorder and a narcissist is not "someone hurting others".
What You Should Know About Narcissistic Personality Disorder
I do not feel that your oversimplifications are beneficial,