• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Go actually read them.... but then that’s why you just make rhetorical claims and fail to support your assertions
  2. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Yes, because you fail to understand...... “For example, following the discovery of a previously unknown gene in the mouse, a scientist will typically perform a BLAST search of the human genome to see if humans carry a similar gene; BLAST will identify sequences in the human genome that resemble...
  3. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Yes, only after we had to listen to how the proved evolution.... Husky produces Husky, Asian produces Asian. Tiny variation is not disputed. Nor is the fact that Asian mates with African and produces the variation Afro-Asian..... You do realize it doesn’t mean it is either. It’s not my burden...
  4. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Yes, I know. Nothing you have said has been factual. Except your statement that you have made no factual claims..... at least you recognize your rhetoric is just that with no factual basis....
  5. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Right here, right now.... I see no facts presented, just more avoidance.....
  6. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    You think we haven’t seen the same avoidance of discussing your “claimed” facts before on this forum?
  7. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Says piltdown man, Nebraska man, etc, etc...... What facts? Bacteria remaining bacteria despite the number of mutations????? Fruit flies remaining fruit flies despite the number of mutations????? Coelacanth being the claimed intermediary for 20 years until one was found alive? That fact...
  8. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    I said you didn’t need permission to ask, ask. Because otherwise your avoidance is getting tiresome.....
  9. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    I see no question..... just idiotic statements....
  10. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    The only one who failed in escape velocity is you, along with your absurdity of curvature causing PE. You spent six useless pages arguing that absurdity you finally had to admit was wrong, while claiming just like you are now it was me that was wrong. It’s only people that think escape velocity...
  11. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    I’m not the one that keeps ignoring that GR has been tested to a 99.8% accuracy in the solar system without one spec of Fairie Dust.... then thinks adding 96% Fairie Dust to a theory already tested to a 99.8% accuracy is ok.... Why do you keep ignoring its accuracy? GR by the way breaks down...
  12. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Ask, not going back hoping to find the question you want answered so you can continue to avoid just restating it so you can continue to pretend it’s not being answered. I said ask, and yet you avoided restating your question just so you can pretend it’s not being answered.... Sad....
  13. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    The James Webb telescope will simply uncover further fully mature galaxies and galaxy clusters falsifying your theories again, even though that’s already been done. You just keep ignoring those mature galaxies and galaxy clusters before they had time to form according to the theory..... Just...
  14. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    I’m not the one ignoring that 100 breeds of dogs came from one wolf stock and yet we can’t get but a few from Poodles..... That’s you who’s biology doesn’t fit reality. Despite bacteria remaining bacteria no matter how many times you mutate them. Fruit flies remaining fruit flies no matter how...
  15. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Just goes to show that people in control direct things wether it’s fact or fiction..... evolution the top fiction of all time....
  16. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Im surprised your still supporting that poo, when we both know the tests they use to convict criminals and do parantagebor relationship testing is nothing similar to the one they use to claim relationships elsewhere. But that’s why you can’t support your claims of poo with any scientific facts.....
  17. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Yes, like imagining an entire race of humanoids from a pigs tooth. Or maybe Nebraska man might spur your factual memory.... They are indeed full of something.....
  18. Justatruthseeker

    40% of peered reviewed scientific articles can't be reproduced

    Your the only one that first used the word conspiracy, so if you don’t know what conspiracy you were talking about I guess you were just saying anything you thought sounded good at the time.... Funny how the one that brings up conspiracy doesn’t even know what conspiracy he’s talking about...
  19. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    96% of your cosmology is ad-hoc and not required where GR has been tested to a 99.8% accuracy. But like I said, you’ll continue to ignore that accuracy.... because you don’t believe in GR at all.
  20. Justatruthseeker

    Evidence for a Young Earth (Not Billions of Years Old)

    Can you understand that General Relativity has been tested to a 99.8% accuracy inside the solar system to clumps of non-ionized matter, planetary systems (.1% of the universe) without any ad-hoc theory added to it???? That the very second you attempt to apply this same theory as the dominating...
Top