Quoting from scripture is not enough. You must also justify the authority of the scripture, then the existence of the scripture's god etc. Others do not take for granted everything that you do yourself.
If you had evidence that backed your claim directly, you could save yourself the trouble...
So far, I see no reason to suppose all this impressive sounding stuff is not all in your head. I do not find fancy word salad at all convincing.
Mysticism is just another religion-type scam. The mystics may live from a begging bowl, but they are not the ones spending all day up to their knees...
Current advanced societies have renounced slavery, torture, limiting compassion to one's own family or tribe, autocracy etc. These were all taken for granted until distressingly recent times. Some societies still haven't caught up.
America is a strange case. It's advance seems slow, with...
Who is "we" here? Where I live, health care is regarded as a right.
I think that the often-touted environmental virtues of the ancients are oversold. They just lacked the technologies needed to make big messes.
Aboriginal peoples are notoriously apt to be murderously xenophobic. Consider the...
I think you may have hold of the wrong end of the stick here. Some idea being old indicates that it is less likely to be reliable not more likely since the ancients were more ignorant and uncivilized than moderns. The bible, for example, shows that very clearly.
I notice that you failed to provide a citation to back up your claim that humans and dinosaurs coexisted.
Please do so, or admit you are repeating idiotic nonsense.
If so many people come up with so many answers to a question, I think the obvious conclusion must be that the question is bogus.
All the religions cannot be right, but they can all be wrong.
False dichotomy. There is the third response of witholding opinion until evidence is found.
The "if there is not yet a natural explanation then a supernatural one must be true" gambit is dishonest.
A good post. Especially as some fields make a virtue of gibberish these days. Post-modernist writing comes to mind. Remember the hilarious Sokal incident?
All sorts of settings can develop into a community. For example, the people who walk their dogs at a local park look out for each other: they care for each othrr's doga, lend a sympathetic ear, provide advice etc. No mumbo-jumbo is needed, no conman clergy are involved.
If anything, religious...
As it happens, I have worked with sheep. They make the fence posts around them look smart. I would be outraged to be described as a sheep, or as part of a flock of them. I wonder if the constant use of the sheep metaphor by christians is some kind of snide joke from the seminaries.
Noah? Genesis? Why should anyone not infected with your brand of superstition pay any attention to your collection of campfire yarns cobbled together by ignorant savages?
Religionists should keep their nonsense to themselves.
There is no reason.
The reason the religious are so uptight about it is that they have been taught to hate their own humanity and to live in a state of morbid guilt. That keeps the pews and collection plates full. It's all the most vicious scam around.
Marriage is a commitment between people. It does not necessarily involve your superstitions.
The religious have no business insisting that everyone measure their corn in the religious half-bushel.
You christians are trying to denying them equal rights. What else can you expect?
You need to realize that your superstitious taboos apply only to you and your fellow religionists.
How stunningly inane it is to accuse someone of choosing not to worship an entity they do not believe exists.
Religion truly does degrade the human intellect.